Federal contractor · HAUPPAUGE, NY

ASR INTERNATIONAL CORP.

ASR INTERNATIONAL CORP. received $7.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 24 awards (−46% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $120.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($3.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.4M
New awards
24
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
6.7%
UEI
E5MFMJ9U75Y1
Small businessMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.8MFY2017
  2. 9.4MFY2018
  3. 8.7MFY2019
  4. 8.7MFY2020
  5. 13.9MFY2021
  6. 17.4MFY2022
  7. 19MFY2023
  8. 14.9MFY2024
  9. 13.8MFY2025
  10. 7.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 14 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 3 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$6.5M87%
  2. Construction & real property$705K9.5%
  3. Education & social services$99.9K1.3%
  4. Facilities & utilities$68.7K0.9%
  5. IT & telecom$59.1K0.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition6.7%
    US 39% · $494K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions6.7%
    US 8.7% · $494K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Virginia Beach city, VA· Professional services· May 24, 2021 – May 29, 2026· N6426721F3002
  2. Department of the Navy· Escambia County, FL· Professional services· Aug 25, 2022 – Dec 10, 2025· N6945022F3003
  3. Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· Professional services· Jan 12, 2024 – Jun 9, 2026· M6700124P1010
  4. Department of the Navy· Kitsap County, WA· Construction & real property· May 19, 2022 – May 28, 2026· N4425522F3000
  5. Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Professional services· Jul 25, 2023 – Mar 26, 2026· N0024423F0346
  6. Department of the Air Force· Clark County, NV· Professional services· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· FA486126F0102
  7. Social Security Administration· Contra Costa County, CA· Professional services· Sep 30, 2020 – Dec 3, 2025· 28321320FDX030421
  8. Department of the Navy· Suffolk County, NY· Professional services· Sep 15, 2025 – May 29, 2026· N6449825F3088

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $7.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $320K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $8.9M reported

  1. NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 23 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MADISON, MS · 5 subawards · Support activities for air transportation

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ANCHORAGE, AK · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CLARKSBURG, MD · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.