Federal contractor · MACON, GA
ATIGUN GROUP, INC.
ATIGUN GROUP, INC. received $10.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (−12% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $41.5M. Its largest customer was Federal Emergency Management Agency ($8.4M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $10.8M
- New awards
- 8
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 5.0%
- UEI
- F5KRZJMNHL58
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 200KFY2017
- 610.1KFY2018
- 772.7KFY2019
- 641.1KFY2020
- 936.1KFY2021
- 2.5MFY2022
- 3.3MFY2023
- 9.4MFY2024
- 12.3MFY2025
- 10.8MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- 1 awards
- Environmental Protection Agency$1.9M17%4 awards
- Department of the Navy$446.2K4.1%1 awards
- Department of the Army$73.8K0.7%1 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$10.4M96%
- Professional services$446.2K4.1%
- Research & development$5000.0%
Where the work was performed
- Calhoun County, AL$8.4M78%
- Alameda County, CA$1M9.6%
- King County, WA$544.8K5.0%
- Nueces County, TX$446.2K4.1%
- Middlesex County, MA$299.6K2.8%
- Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK$73.8K0.7%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition5.0%US 39% · $544.8K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions5.0%US 8.7% · $544.8K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Federal Emergency Management Agency· Calhoun County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Jul 31, 2024 – Sep 28, 2026· 70FA2024C00000009
- Environmental Protection Agency· King County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 19, 2022 – Jul 16, 2026· 68HE0722C0004
- Environmental Protection Agency· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Aug 26, 2021 – Jan 12, 2026· 68HE0621F0029
- Environmental Protection Agency· Middlesex County, MA· Facilities & utilities· Oct 12, 2021 – Sep 23, 2026· 68HE0122F0002
- Environmental Protection Agency· Alameda County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Sep 11, 2024 – Jul 10, 2026· 68HE0924F0100
- Department of the Navy· Nueces County, TX· Professional services· Feb 24, 2022 – Jan 30, 2026· N6883622F0056
- Department of the Army· Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK· Facilities & utilities· Jan 30, 2024 – Jan 27, 2026· W911KB24F0022
- Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Dec 5, 2025· HQ085926FE451
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $46.3K reported
- DPR-RQ CONSTRUCTION, LLC$46.3KCARLSBAD, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- RANGER LAND SYSTEMS, INC.$117M−29% in FY2026HUNTSVILLE, AL · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Emergency Management Agency · Facilities support services
- COTTON COMMERCIAL USA, INC.$194M−108% in FY2026KATY, TX · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Emergency Management Agency · Facilities support services
- CASO LOGZONE LLC$5.4M+48% in FY2026LYNNFIELD, MA · 13% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Facilities support services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.