Federal contractor · TAMPA, FL

ATKINSREALIS USA MANAGEMENT LLC

ATKINSREALIS USA MANAGEMENT LLC received $2.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+192% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $10.5M. Its largest customer was Federal Transit Administration ($2.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.5M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PHU9YG548KS8
Parent company
GROUPE SNC-LAVALIN INC
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ISOTEK SYSTEMS, LLC company family: 9 registered entities, $80.4M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ISOTEK SYSTEMS, LLCOAK RIDGE, TN · Family page
    $57.9M
  2. $17.8M
  3. $3.4M
  4. ATKINS/HALFF JVDALLAS, TX
    $0
  5. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 155.5KFY2019
  2. 1.7MFY2020
  3. 2.8MFY2021
  4. 1.6MFY2022
  5. 378.8KFY2023
  6. 668.6KFY2024
  7. 839.1KFY2025
  8. 2.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$2.5M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$267.4K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$267.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Transit Administration· Hillsborough County, FL· Professional services· Sep 23, 2024 – Jul 30, 2026· 69319524F30152N
  2. Federal Transit Administration· Hillsborough County, FL· Professional services· Sep 5, 2025 – Sep 2, 2026· 69319525F30100N
  3. Federal Transit Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 20, 2019 – Sep 17, 2026· 69319519F300121

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

12 companies · $92.2M reported

  1. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION$45.5M
    DENVER, CO · 18 subawards
  2. LYNCHBURG, VA · 10 subawards · Waste treatment and disposal
  3. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 7 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. TOTAL COMPUTER SOLUTIONS, INC.$91.5M−58% in FY2026
    BURKE, VA · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. CBEYONDATA LLC$85.2M−72% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ISOTEK SYSTEMS, LLC (9 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • ATKINSREALIS USA HOLDINGS, LLCAI match · 99%
PAC giving · 2026
$2,500
1 PAC

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$2,500100%

PACs sponsored

  • ATKINSREALIS USA HOLDINGS, LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$69.3K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.