Federal contractor · MONTGOMERY, AL

AUBURN UNIVERSITY MONTGOMERY

No contract obligations recorded for AUBURN UNIVERSITY MONTGOMERY in FY2026. It also received $10.5M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
S2Y7SMVZ1R96
Parent company
AUBURN UNIVERSITY
Other than small businessNonprofitEducational institution

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the AUBURN UNIVERSITY company family: 2 registered entities, $10.4M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. AUBURN UNIVERSITYAUBURN, AL · Family page
    $10.4M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 36.9KFY2018

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for AUBURN UNIVERSITY MONTGOMERY in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

AUBURN UNIVERSITY MONTGOMERY received $10.5M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 203 actions (9 new awards), −3.9% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program ($9M).

Assistance · FY2026
$10.5M
New awards
9
Actions
203
Since FY2021
$73.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 26.2MFY2021
  2. 6.4MFY2022
  3. 9.8MFY2023
  4. 9.6MFY2024
  5. 10.9MFY2025
  6. 10.5MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$9.5M91%
  2. Grants$978.6K9.3%

Top programs

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$9M86%
  2. 93.310 · Trans-NIH Research Support$508.5K4.8%
  3. 10.855 · Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grants$436.2K4.1%
  4. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program$350.3K3.3%
  5. 84.007 · Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants$163.9K1.6%
  6. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training$151.3K1.4%
  7. 84.379 · Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (Teach GRANTS)$22.6K0.2%
  8. 15.808 · U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection-$117.4K0.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Rural Utilities Service$436.2K4.1%
    Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 28, 2024 – Sep 16, 2026· P063P243070
  2. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 28, 2025 – Sep 1, 2026· P063P253070
  3. 15.808 · U.S. Geological Survey Research and Data Collection· U.S. Geological Survey· Cooperative agreement· Sep 20, 2021 – May 15, 2026· G19AC00369
  4. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training· National Institutes of Health· Cooperative agreement· Mar 20, 2026 – Jul 9, 2026· UC2GM162936
  5. 93.310 · Trans-NIH Research Support· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Sep 1, 2026 – Sep 11, 2026· R15HD119728
  6. 43.001 · Science· National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Project grant· Aug 20, 2021 – Jun 16, 2026· 80NSSC21K1431

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $60K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF$60K100%
    MONTGOMERY, AL · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $75K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3,240 received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $115K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $60K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

139 companies · $72.9M reported

  1. RAPID CITY, SD · 10 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. GAINESVILLE, FL · 12 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. BLACKSBURG, VA · 10 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

133 companies · $130.2M reported

  1. MONTGOMERY, AL · 51 subawards
  2. BIRMINGHAM, AL · 43 subawards
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 52 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 25 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$34.3M−34% in FY2026
    ROCHESTER, NY · 3 entities · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Colleges, universities, and professional schoolsAir Force · Scientific research and development services+1 more
  2. WYZKYDS CONSULTING LLC$20M−100% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. POLARIS SENSOR TECHNOLOGIES INC$20.2M−100% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of AUBURN UNIVERSITY (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Auburn UniversityAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$210K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$650K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$140K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$120K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$210K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$180K
    3 reports

Top issues

  1. Aerospace15 reports
  2. Agriculture15 reports
  3. Animals15 reports
  4. Budget and appropriations15 reports
  5. Defense15 reports
  6. Education15 reports
  7. Energy and nuclear15 reports
  8. Homeland security15 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES15 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE15 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. McKinnon Group, LLC$650K
    15 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.