Federal contractor · TORRANCE, CA

AURORA SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC

AURORA SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC received $3.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 61 awards (−57% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $128.5M. Its largest customer was Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ($1.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.9M
New awards
61
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
4.6%
UEI
C1NMTBMS4KG5
Small businessMinority-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 989.4KFY2017
  2. 425.4KFY2018
  3. 4.5MFY2019
  4. 16MFY2020
  5. 23.5MFY2021
  6. 27.8MFY2022
  7. 23.3MFY2023
  8. 19.1MFY2024
  9. 9.1MFY2025
  10. 3.9MFY2026
  11. 0FY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency$1.2M32%
    1 awards
  2. Defense Information Systems Agency$576.5K15%
    3 awards
  3. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office$326.1K8.4%
    1 awards
  4. Office of the Inspector General$258.3K6.7%
    1 awards
  5. Washington Headquarters Services$249.4K6.4%
    2 awards
  6. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management$201.5K5.2%
    1 awards
  7. Department of the Air Force$184.3K4.8%
    5 awards
  8. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources$138.2K3.6%
    1 awards
  9. Department of Energy$104.8K2.7%
    14 awards
  10. Federal Trade Commission$89.9K2.3%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$3.8M99%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$27.2K0.7%
  3. Research & development$17.2K0.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Los Angeles County, CA$2.2M58%
  2. District of Columbia, DC$509.8K13%
  3. Anne Arundel County, MD$480K12%
  4. Fairfax County, VA$245.4K6.3%
  5. Greene County, OH$78.8K2.0%
  6. Fayette County, KY$72.7K1.9%
  7. Prince George's County, MD$52.1K1.3%
  8. Denver County, CO$47.2K1.2%
  9. Okaloosa County, FL$40.1K1.0%
  10. Kern County, CA$32.5K0.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition4.6%
    US 39% · $177.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions4.6%
    US 8.7% · $177.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. MICROSOFT PREMIER SUPPORT$3.5M
    Office of the Comptroller of the Currency· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Oct 1, 2023 – Jan 13, 2026· 2031JW24F00003
  2. INFORMATICA POWERCENTER SOFTWARE$1.1M
    Washington Headquarters Services· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Mar 31, 2022 – Jan 29, 2026· HQ003422F0157
  3. ALFRESCO SOFTWARE RENEWAL MAINTENANCE$944.3K
    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Mar 28, 2024 – Mar 24, 2026· 1333BJ24F00282022
  4. 210T-ACRO-P-FRL$941.6K
    Department of the Navy· Berkeley County, SC· IT & telecom· Aug 22, 2023 – Oct 9, 2025· N6523623F0639
  5. BASE YEAR - CLEARSWIFT$849K
    Defense Information Systems Agency· Anne Arundel County, MD· IT & telecom· Mar 25, 2025 – Mar 4, 2026· HC102825F0333
  6. ORDER ISSUED TO PROCURE BRAND NAME OR EQUAL ALFRESCO DIGITAL SOFTWARE SERVICES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR (DOL) OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (OCIO).$750.4K
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Dec 23, 2022 – Sep 9, 2026· 1605TA23F00007
  7. QUALTRICS$723.4K
    National Science Foundation· Alexandria city, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 5, 2023 – Dec 9, 2025· 49100423F0210
  8. TECHNOPEDIA LICENSE RENEWAL (FLEXERA)$493.1K
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 15, 2023 – Jun 3, 2026· 75P00123F80195

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $108.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $171.7K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $38.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $2.2M reported

  1. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED$1.7M
    PASCAGOULA, MS · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC$279.8K
    FAIRFIELD, NJ · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.$68.5K
    GERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 61 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. OGIS COMMUNICATION GROUP INC$24.8M−36% in FY2026
    CINCINNATI, OH · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesOffice of the Comptroller of the Currency · Computer systems design and related services+11 more
  2. AMERICAN WORDATA, INC$24.5M−64% in FY2026
    TAMPA, FL · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services+9 more
  3. SPATIAL INTEGRATED SYSTEMS INC$7.5M−21% in FY2026
    BROADLANDS, VA · 2 entities · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Computer systems design and related services+2 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.