Federal contractor · LEXINGTON PARK, MD

AUSLEY ASSOCIATES, INC

AUSLEY ASSOCIATES, INC received -$478.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−113% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $114.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy (-$478.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$478.4K
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
J2GSZZRG6J93
Parent company
MAG DS CORP.
Small businessVeteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 18.2MFY2017
  2. 14.5MFY2018
  3. 18MFY2019
  4. 18.3MFY2020
  5. 16MFY2021
  6. 7.1MFY2022
  7. 9.3MFY2023
  8. 9.8MFY2024
  9. 3.6MFY2025
  10. -478.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy-$478.4K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. PM SUPPORT SERVICES$61.3M
    Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Professional services· Jun 15, 2018 – May 21, 2026· N0042118F0645

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $7.8M paid out · $4.5M received
  • FY2022: $4.2M paid out · $274.1K received
  • FY2023: $2.3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $295.4K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $32K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

9 companies · $14.6M reported

  1. SABRE SYSTEMS, LLC$4M
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. J.F. TAYLOR, INC.$3.4M
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. STRACON SERVICES GROUP, LLC$2.6M
    BENBROOK, TX · 6 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $4.8M reported

  1. KBR SERVICES, LLC$1.9M
    HOUSTON, TX · 3 subawards · Support activities for air transportation
  2. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$1.3M
    RESTON, VA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. J.F. TAYLOR, INC.$852.4K
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INNOVATIVE REASONING LLC$12.8M−57% in FY2026
    ORLANDO, FL · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ACUCYBER LLC$12.4M−4.2% in FY2026
    MOUNT PLEASANT, SC · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. WARRANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC$12.3M−29% in FY2026
    BLOOMINGTON, IN · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.