Federal contractor · BARTON

AUSTRALIAN STRATEGIC POLICY INSTITUTE

AUSTRALIAN STRATEGIC POLICY INSTITUTE received $313.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Its largest customer was Department of State ($188.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$313.5K
New awards
2
Sole-source
40%
Single offer
60%
UEI
CN3PS4G1QAN5
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 313.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$188.1K60%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$125.4K40%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $313.5K
  • Sole-source awards40%
    US 30% · $125.4K
  • Single-offer competitions60%
    US 8.7% · $188.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Other equipment & supplies· May 22, 2026 – May 22, 2026· FA239626PB047
  2. Department of State· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· May 12, 2026 – May 12, 2026· 19AQMM26P0468

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

AUSTRALIAN STRATEGIC POLICY INSTITUTE received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$2.7M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 1.7MFY2021
  2. 1.1MFY2022
  3. -7.6FY2023
  4. -129.7KFY2024
  5. -0FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SHANGHAI, CHN · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. MONTEVIDEO, URY · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. GUAYAQUIL, ECU · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.