Federal contractor · SUFFOLK, VA

AUTOMATIC COATING LIMITED USA

AUTOMATIC COATING LIMITED USA received $1.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 13 awards (−17% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $3.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($1.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.7M
New awards
13
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
2.3%
UEI
DT8BYNMAFZ25
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.5KFY2024
  2. 2MFY2025
  3. 1.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 12 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$1.5M89%
  2. Equipment maintenance$156.6K9.3%
  3. Professional services$20.1K1.2%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition2.3%
    US 39% · $38.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions2.3%
    US 8.8% · $38.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Suffolk city, VA· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 15, 2026 – Jan 15, 2026· N0016426FG018
  2. U.S. Coast Guard· Suffolk city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Sep 29, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 70Z08026FMECP0051
  3. U.S. Coast Guard· Suffolk city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Aug 24, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 70Z08026FMECP0037
  4. U.S. Coast Guard· Monroe County, FL· Professional services· Dec 9, 2025 – Dec 9, 2025· 70Z08026PMECP0022
  5. U.S. Coast Guard· Suffolk city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Jun 3, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· 70Z08026FMECP0021
  6. U.S. Coast Guard· Suffolk city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Jun 1, 2026 – Sep 2, 2026· 70Z08026FMECP0020
  7. U.S. Coast Guard· Chesapeake city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Nov 20, 2025 – Nov 20, 2025· 70Z08026PMECP0011
  8. U.S. Coast Guard· Suffolk city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Aug 25, 2026 – Aug 25, 2026· 70Z08026FMECP0039

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $864.6K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $474.3K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $864.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $1.3M reported

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward
  2. YORK, PA · 2 subawards · Ship and boat building

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. A & A CO INC$5.3M+505% in FY2026
    SOUTH PLAINFIELD, NJ · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Coating, engraving, heat treating, and allied activities
  2. BRADDOCK METALLURGICAL, INC.$375.4K−100% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, FL · 10% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Coating, engraving, heat treating, and allied activities
  3. MILLER & SON$313.4K−35% in FY2026
    BELLEVILLE, NJ · 8.4% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Coating, engraving, heat treating, and allied activities

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.