Federal contractor · DENVER, CO

AUXILIO MANAGEMENT SERVICES

AUXILIO MANAGEMENT SERVICES received $1.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (+1.5% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $43.3M. Its largest customer was U.S. Geological Survey ($748.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.8M
New awards
10
Sole-source
63%
Single offer
7.8%
UEI
DJ6RJJYDQH65
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.4MFY2017
  2. 4.1MFY2018
  3. 2.9MFY2019
  4. 5.3MFY2020
  5. 7.1MFY2021
  6. 5.8MFY2022
  7. 5MFY2023
  8. 4.2MFY2024
  9. 1.8MFY2025
  10. 1.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 4 awards
  3. 5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.7M92%
  2. Professional services$151.6K8.3%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition71%
    US 39% · $1.3M
  • Sole-source awards63%
    US 30% · $1.2M
  • Single-offer competitions7.8%
    US 8.7% · $142.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Geological Survey· Denver County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jan 31, 2022 – May 13, 2026· 140G0222C0003
  2. National Institute of Standards and Technology· Denver County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Mar 8, 2021 – Aug 12, 2026· 1333ND21CNB190012
  3. National Institute of Standards and Technology· Montgomery County, MD· Professional services· Sep 20, 2021 – Sep 4, 2026· 1333ND21CNB190057
  4. Department of the Army· Sebastian County, AR· Professional services· Sep 20, 2024 – Apr 29, 2026· W9126G24F0375
  5. National Institute of Standards and Technology· Montgomery County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Jul 31, 2026 – Jul 31, 2026· 1333ND26FNB190145
  6. Department of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Mar 25, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· W912BV26FA038
  7. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 22, 2023 – Nov 20, 2025· W912BV23F0168
  8. Department of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 15, 2022 – Dec 4, 2025· W912BV22F0132

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NEW YORK, NY · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institute of Standards and Technology · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. SAPERE CONSULTING INC$4.7M−100% in FY2026
    SPOKANE VALLEY, WA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. PLYMOUTH, MI · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesForest Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.