Federal contractor · UNION, MI

B B N H ENTERPRISES INC

B B N H ENTERPRISES INC received $799.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (−31% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($793.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$799.5K
New awards
15
Sole-source
1.8%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UEKPCZ212GV5
Parent company
B B N H ENTERPRISES INC
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 32.7KFY2018
  2. 322.8KFY2020
  3. 849.7KFY2021
  4. 781.2KFY2022
  5. 929.6KFY2023
  6. 1.2MFY2024
  7. 1.2MFY2025
  8. 799.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 13 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$748.9K94%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$50.6K6.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. Cass County, MI$5,8940.7%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition1.8%
    US 39% · $14.2K
  • Sole-source awards1.8%
    US 30% · $14.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Lewis and Clark County, MT· Facilities & utilities· May 26, 2026 – May 26, 2026· W9124V26FA011
  2. Department of the Army· Lewis and Clark County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Dec 3, 2025 – Dec 3, 2025· W9124V26FA001
  3. Department of the Army· Lewis and Clark County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Dec 23, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025· W9124V26FA002
  4. Department of the Army· Lewis and Clark County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 6, 2025 – Oct 24, 2025· W9124V25FA018
  5. Department of the Army· Lewis and Clark County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Apr 29, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· W9124V26FA005
  6. Department of the Army· Lewis and Clark County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Mar 23, 2026 – Mar 23, 2026· W9124V26FA003
  7. Department of the Army· Lewis and Clark County, MT· Facilities & utilities· May 15, 2026 – May 15, 2026· W9124V26FA007
  8. Department of the Army· Lewis and Clark County, MT· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 9, 2026 – Jan 9, 2026· W9124V26PA002

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAINT PAUL, MN · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services
  3. FITTEST, INC$3.6M+1.6% in FY2026
    INCHEON, KOR · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.