Federal contractor · MOON TOWNSHIP, PA

BAKER-STANLEY-CARDNO JV

BAKER-STANLEY-CARDNO JV received $11.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+4.3% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $99.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($11.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$11.9M
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
22%
UEI
NYSXZVG5KJJ3
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6MFY2017
  2. 129KFY2018
  3. 3.1MFY2019
  4. 35.2MFY2020
  5. -4.2MFY2021
  6. 16.2MFY2022
  7. 10.6MFY2023
  8. 9.1MFY2024
  9. 11.5MFY2025
  10. 11.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$11.9M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$9.7M81%
  2. Bexar County, TX$697.9K5.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition22%
    US 39% · $2.6M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions22%
    US 8.7% · $2.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Dec 7, 2025 – Jun 12, 2026· FA890326F0016
  2. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2024 – Mar 4, 2026· FA520524F0132
  3. Department of the Air Force· Harrison County, MS· Construction & real property· Sep 21, 2022 – Jan 20, 2026· FA890322F0059
  4. Department of the Air Force· Middlesex County, MA· Construction & real property· Mar 3, 2023 – Jun 9, 2026· FA890323F0009
  5. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· Construction & real property· Jul 12, 2024 – Jan 22, 2026· FA850124F0082
  6. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 15, 2021 – Jun 12, 2026· FA557021F0029
  7. Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Construction & real property· Mar 1, 2023 – Jun 12, 2026· FA890323F0027

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $76.9K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $130.7K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $156.3K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3 companies · $363.9K reported

  1. MARYVILLE, MO · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. EL PASO, TX · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SOMAT ENGINEERING INC$30.9K
    DETROIT, MI · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MCCRONE ASSOCIATES INC$32.7M+11% in FY2026
    WESTMONT, IL · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MARTINEZ-DRMP JV, LLC$34M−37% in FY2026
    MERRITT ISLAND, FL · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BELLEVUE, NE · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.