Federal contractor · NASHVILLE, TN
BARGE EMERSION JOINT VENTURE
BARGE EMERSION JOINT VENTURE received $1.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−72% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $50.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.5M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $1.5M
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 100%
- UEI
- KJ29MTU1EVM4
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.3MFY2017
- 4.6MFY2018
- 9.2MFY2019
- 2.2MFY2020
- 385.9KFY2021
- 5.7MFY2022
- 5.1MFY2023
- 15.5MFY2024
- 5.4MFY2025
- 1.5MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$1.5M100%3 awards
- Department of the Air Force-$3,8910.0%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$1.5M100%
Where the work was performed
- Greene County, OH$1.5M99%
- Yuma County, AZ$19.6K1.3%
- Jefferson County, KY$2,5000.2%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $1.5M
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions100%US 8.7% · $1.5M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- BASE BID$2.6MDepartment of the Army· Greene County, OH· Construction & real property· Aug 28, 2024 – May 27, 2026· W912QR24F0238
- Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Construction & real property· Aug 20, 2025 – Apr 20, 2026· FA860125F0219
- Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Construction & real property· Aug 1, 2025 – May 26, 2026· FA860125F0088
- Department of the Army· Yuma County, AZ· Construction & real property· May 2, 2025 – Feb 9, 2026· W912QR25F0043
- Department of the Army· Jefferson County, KY· Construction & real property· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· W912QR26FA035
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2023: $1.2M paid out · $0 received
- FY2024: $1.7M paid out · $0 received
- FY2025: $1.7M paid out · $0 received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
17 companies · $4.6M reported
- PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING, INC.$902.4KKNOXVILLE, TN · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- COLUMBUS, OH · 10 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- EAST PITTSBURGH, PA · 14 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes that pay it
No prime reported paying it.
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- ATKINS - BLACK & VEATCH - FSB JV$22.2M+454% in FY2026DENVER, CO · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- BLAIR REMY MERRICK MP JOINT VENTURE, LLC$21.7M−46% in FY2026OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- YAEGER ARCHITECTURE INC$21.6M−44% in FY2026LENEXA, KS · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.