Federal contractor · MOBILE, AL
BASKERVILLE DONOVAN INC
BASKERVILLE DONOVAN INC received $940.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−90% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $36.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($882.3K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $940.1K
- New awards
- 12
- Sole-source
- 6.2%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- D88DYJMW2ED9
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.2MFY2017
- 2.1MFY2018
- 2.5MFY2019
- 5.1MFY2020
- 2.7MFY2021
- 4MFY2022
- 3.1MFY2023
- 5.6MFY2024
- 9.3MFY2025
- 940.1KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$882.3K94%11 awards
- 1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$882.3K94%
- Professional services$57.8K6.2%
Where the work was performed
- Mobile County, AL$636.4K68%
- Abroad$245.9K26%
- Escambia County, FL$57.8K6.2%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition6.2%US 39% · $57.8K
- Sole-source awards6.2%US 30% · $57.8K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Mobile County, AL· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2025 – Apr 20, 2026· W9127825FA320
- HONDURAS FY25 HAP ISS$207.7KDepartment of the Army· Mobile County, AL· Construction & real property· Jul 9, 2025 – Jun 9, 2026· W9127825FA059
- Department of the Army· Mobile County, AL· Construction & real property· Mar 4, 2025 – Apr 13, 2026· W9127825F0094
- Department of the Army· Mobile County, AL· Construction & real property· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· W9127826FA147
- Department of the Army· Dale County, AL· Construction & real property· Sep 27, 2023 – Feb 19, 2026· W9127823F0445
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- GEO CONSULTANTS CORPORATION$16.3M−97% in FY2026KEVIL, KY · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- T2S, LLC$15.1M+97,096% in FY2026BELCAMP, MD · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- SHREWSBERRY-MEAD & HUNT SB JOINT VENTURE$15M+9,980% in FY2026INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.