Federal contractor · ANNISTON, AL

BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE

No contract obligations recorded for BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE in FY2026. Since FY2021: $1.1M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
GQKQBXZSD5J3
Parent company
BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE
Other than small businessNonprofit
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLC company family: 10 registered entities, $3.8B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLCIDAHO FALLS, ID · Family page
    $2.1B
  2. BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTERICHLAND, WA
    $1.4B
  3. BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTECOLUMBUS, OH
    $313.9M
  4. BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLCIDAHO FALLS, ID
    $0
  5. BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTEMELBOURNE, FL
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.2MFY2021
  2. -13.8KFY2022

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

910 companies · $713.1M reported

  1. CLIMEWORKS CORP$61.2M
    WILMINGTON, DE · 1 subaward
  2. AMPLIFYBIO LLC$28.3M
    WEST JEFFERSON, OH · 44 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. EQT CORPORATION$27.9M
    PITTSBURGH, PA · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

111 companies · $224.7M reported

  1. FLUOR MARINE PROPULSION, LLC$48M
    GREENVILLE, SC · 25 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. CH2M HILL, INC$19M
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 169 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ASSURED INFORMATION SECURITY, INC.$17.3M
    ROME, NY · 18 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 59 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$4.3B−3.7% in FY2026
    OAKLAND, CA · 9 entities · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Scientific research and development services
  2. UCHICAGO ARGONNE, LLC$3.6B−6.1% in FY2026
    CHICAGO, IL · 3 entities · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Scientific research and development services
  3. LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$10.5B+2.6% in FY2026
    LIVERMORE, CA · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnergy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLC (10 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTEAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$840K
28 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.3M
$3.2M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$1M
    28 reports
  2. 2024$970K
    28 reports
  3. 2025$840K
    28 reports
  4. 2026$410K
    13 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations67 reports
  2. Defense44 reports
  3. Homeland security29 reports
  4. Energy and nuclear28 reports
  5. Health issues28 reports
  6. Intelligence and surveillance28 reports
  7. Science and technology28 reports
  8. Environment and Superfund17 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES97 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE89 reports
  3. Energy - Dept of14 reports
  4. Office of Management & Budget (OMB)3 reports
  5. Defense - Dept of (DOD)2 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. A1.9 STRATEGIES LLC$600K
    15 reports
  2. Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$550K
    14 reports
  3. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$430K
    14 reports
  4. SL STRATEGIES, LLC$302.5K
    14 reports
  5. BERQUAM VENTURES, LLC$240K
    12 reports
  6. American Defense International, Inc.$140K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.