Federal contractor · OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

BENHAM DESIGN, LLC

BENHAM DESIGN, LLC received $1.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−57% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $54M. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($1.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.8M
New awards
12
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
91%
UEI
EQSVJGTCL921
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3MFY2017
  2. 3.8MFY2018
  3. 14.3MFY2019
  4. 4MFY2020
  5. 5MFY2021
  6. 5.2MFY2022
  7. 3.4MFY2023
  8. 9.3MFY2024
  9. 4.3MFY2025
  10. 1.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 4 awards
  3. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$1.8M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. King County, WA$145.7K8.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition91%
    US 39% · $1.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions91%
    US 8.8% · $1.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Aug 9, 2024 – Mar 3, 2026· W912DY24F0239
  2. Department of the Army· Rock Island County, IL· Construction & real property· May 20, 2024 – Mar 26, 2026· W912QR24F0149
  3. Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· May 19, 2026 – May 19, 2026· 6973GH26F00833
  4. Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· May 15, 2024 – Dec 16, 2025· 6973GH24F00829
  5. Department of the Army· Yakima County, WA· Construction & real property· Jun 2, 2025 – Apr 8, 2026· W912DW25F2029
  6. Department of the Army· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 23, 2024 – Apr 14, 2026· W912DY24F0419
  7. Federal Aviation Administration· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Aug 28, 2020 – Apr 16, 2026· 6973GH20F01572
  8. Public Buildings Service· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Nov 22, 2024 – May 8, 2026· 47PH0625F0010

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $174.1K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $3.1M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

4 companies · $3.2M reported

  1. MUSCATINE, IA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. NORMAN, OK · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SSFM INTERNATIONAL, INC.$9.6M+70% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. POND-WOOLPERT, LLC$9.7M−100% in FY2026
    DAYTON, OH · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.