Federal contractor · MARTINSBURG, WV

BERKELEY CO PUBLIC SERVICE DIST

BERKELEY CO PUBLIC SERVICE DIST received $146.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−16% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.7M. Its largest customer was Internal Revenue Service ($146.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$146.6K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
S92KHGBLZK31
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 135.8KFY2017
  2. 146.4KFY2018
  3. 596.9KFY2019
  4. 88.9KFY2020
  5. 71.1KFY2021
  6. 107.5KFY2022
  7. 164.4KFY2023
  8. 93.5KFY2024
  9. 175.6KFY2025
  10. 146.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Internal Revenue Service$146.6K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$146.6K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Berkeley County, WV$146.6K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $146.6K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $146.6K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Internal Revenue Service$146.6K
    Department of the Treasury · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. WATER CONTRACT FOR THE FACILITIES IN KEARNEYSVILLE, WV WHICH WILL RUN FROM 10/01/2025 - 09/30/2026$146.6K
    Internal Revenue Service· Berkeley County, WV· Facilities & utilities· Oct 6, 2025 – Apr 16, 2026· 2023H226P00038

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

BERKELEY CO PUBLIC SERVICE DIST received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2024
$3M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 3MFY2024
  2. 0FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2024–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $40K reported

  1. EASTERN PANHANDLE REGIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL$40K
    MARTINSBURG, WV · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BONA VISTA WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT$216.5K−11% in FY2026
    OGDEN, UT · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Water, sewage and other systems
  2. TOWN OF ANDOVER$177.8K+3.8% in FY2026
    ANDOVER, MA · 2 entities · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Water, sewage and other systems
  3. SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY$71K+4.7% in FY2026
    OAKDALE, NY · 17% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Water, sewage and other systems

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.