Federal contractor · COLUMBIA, MD
BIGBEAR.AI FEDERAL, LLC
BIGBEAR.AI FEDERAL, LLC received $3.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+25% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $22.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($3.2M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $3.9M
- New awards
- 3
- Sole-source
- 82%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- HAVJMX6JABV5
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 3.7MFY2017
- 3MFY2018
- 1.2MFY2019
- 657.3KFY2020
- 663.9KFY2021
- 839.2KFY2022
- 680.2KFY2023
- 5MFY2024
- 3.1MFY2025
- 3.9MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$3.2M82%1 awards
- Export-Import Bank of the United States$699.8K18%1 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$3.9M100.0%
- Research & development$5000.0%
Where the work was performed
- Howard County, MD$3.2M82%
- District of Columbia, DC$699.8K18%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition82%US 39% · $3.2M
- Sole-source awards82%US 30% · $3.2M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Howard County, MD· Professional services· Mar 3, 2025 – Jun 5, 2026· W519TC25C0017
- Export-Import Bank of the United States· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jun 16, 2022 – May 13, 2026· 83310122F0037
- Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF663
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $13.2M received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $21.5M received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $35.6M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $26.9M received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $33.2M received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
5 companies · $130.5M reported
- ANN ARBOR, MI · 28 subawards
- BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$22.3MMCLEAN, VA · 17 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
- ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- ZENLOGIC JV LLC$9.9M−100% in FY2026ARLINGTON, VA · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- PDO AHUSAKA JV II, LLC$10.2M−90% in FY2026MILWAUKEE, WI · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- APPTRICITY CORPORATION$11M−10% in FY2026IRVING, TX · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Lobbying and PAC activity
Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.
Matched organizations
- BIGBEAR.AI LLCAI match · 96%
- Lobbying · 2025
- $325K
- 10 reports
- Lobbying · 2023–2026
- $735K
- PAC giving · 2026
- $2,000
- 1 PAC
Lobbying by year
- 2023$100K3 reports
- 2024$150K4 reports
- 2025$325K10 reports
- 2026$160K4 reports
Top issues
- Defense16 reports
- Computer industry6 reports
- Budget and appropriations1 reports
Who was contacted
- U.S. SENATE12 reports
- U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES11 reports
- Defense - Dept of (DOD)8 reports
- Army - Dept of (Other)4 reports
- Navy - Dept of4 reports
- Commerce - Dept of (DOC)3 reports
- Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)3 reports
- Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)2 reports
- State - Dept of (DOS)2 reports
Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).
Lobbying firms hired
- Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$350K5 reports
- FTI Government Affairs$270K8 reports
- HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$100K3 reports
- CAPITAL PARK PARTNERS LLC$15K5 reports
Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.
PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle
- Republican$2,000100%
PACs sponsored
- BIGBEAR.AI LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$5,000 raised this cycle
PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.
Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.
Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.
Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.
Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.