Federal contractor · PASADENA, CA

BIRDI SYSTEMS, INC.

BIRDI SYSTEMS, INC. received $7.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−28% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $46.1M. Its largest customer was Food and Drug Administration ($7.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.6M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
V9GQDSV61KR7
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 31.2KFY2019
  2. 2.3MFY2020
  3. 2.1MFY2021
  4. 2.7MFY2022
  5. 1.4MFY2023
  6. 19.3MFY2024
  7. 10.6MFY2025
  8. 7.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Food and Drug Administration$7.6M100%
    2 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$7.6M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Prince George's County, MD$7.6M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. MDI/SOFTWARE HOUSE SECURITY INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE - TASK ORDER 3$18.1M
    Food and Drug Administration· Prince George's County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Aug 15, 2025 – Sep 28, 2026· 75F40125F19003
  2. MDI/SOFTWARE HOUSE SECURITY INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE$8.1M
    Food and Drug Administration· Prince George's County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Sep 11, 2024 – Aug 4, 2026· 75F40124F19002
  3. SEAPORT NXG MINIMUM OBLIGATION TASK ORDER$500
    Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· Professional services· Jul 14, 2021 – Mar 19, 2026· N0017821F8958

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COMPUTER EVIDENCE SPECIALISTS, LLC$26.7M+59% in FY2026
    SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Investigation and security services
  2. MADISON ASSOCIATES INC$72.1M−64% in FY2026
    LEESBURG, VA · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Investigation and security services
  3. OLGOONIK SOLUTIONS LLC$49.8M−35% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 2 entities · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFood and Drug Administration · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Birdi Systems, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$105K
2 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$145K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$40K
    1 reports
  2. 2026$105K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense2 reports
  2. Government issues2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES2 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE2 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)1 reports
  4. Food & Drug Administration (FDA)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. TSG ADVOCATES DC, LLC$145K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.