Federal contractor · BISMARCK, ND

BISMARCK STATE COLLEGE

No contract obligations recorded for BISMARCK STATE COLLEGE in FY2026. Since FY2025: $36.9K. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($0). It also received $5.7M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
X7USJWX9MST5
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA company family: 5 registered entities, -$67.9K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTAGRAND FORKS, ND · Family page
    -$67.9K
  2. $0
  3. $0
  4. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 36.9KFY2025
  2. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Energy· Burleigh County, ND· Education & social services· Feb 11, 2025 – Mar 9, 2026· 89503025PWA000486

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

BISMARCK STATE COLLEGE received $5.7M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 183 actions (7 new awards), −8.2% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program ($5M).

Assistance · FY2026
$5.7M
New awards
7
Actions
183
Since FY2021
$47.2M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 7.1MFY2021
  2. 7.4MFY2022
  3. 6MFY2023
  4. 14.9MFY2024
  5. 6.2MFY2025
  6. 5.7MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$5.2M91%
  2. Grants$528.1K9.3%

Top programs

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$5M88%
  2. 17.504 · Consultation Agreements$600K11%
  3. 84.007 · Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants$88.4K1.6%
  4. 10.351 · Rural Business Development Grant$51K0.9%
  5. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program$40.5K0.7%
  6. 10.310 · Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI)-$38.9K0.0%
  7. 77.008 · U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Scholarship and Fellowship Program-$84K0.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Labor
  2. Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Sep 15, 2025 – Sep 4, 2026· P063P251970
  2. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Sep 13, 2024 – Nov 3, 2025· P063P241970
  3. 17.268 · H-1B Job Training Grants· Employment and Training Administration· Grant· Sep 26, 2023 – Aug 14, 2026· 23A60HG000040
  4. 17.504 · Consultation Agreements· Occupational Safety and Health Administration· Grant· Nov 18, 2025 – Jun 5, 2026· 26F50CS000121
  5. 17.504 · Consultation Agreements· Occupational Safety and Health Administration· Cooperative agreement· Oct 2, 2024 – Jan 23, 2026· 25F75CS000061
  6. 10.310 · Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI)· National Institute of Food and Agriculture· Project grant· Feb 8, 2021 – Jun 24, 2026· 20216703834276

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $927.9K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $153.2K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $806.3K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $90.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

132 companies · $76.4M reported

  1. NORWELL, MA · 3 subawards
  2. MINNKOTA POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.$6.6M
    GRAND FORKS, ND · 2 subawards
  3. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

66 companies · $87.1M reported

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HEARTLAND HYDROGEN HUB, LLC$9.4M
    GRAND FORKS, ND · 1 subaward
  3. BISMARCK, ND · 47 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TUCSON, AZ · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. TOP GRAIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$3.6M−100% in FY2026
    HOUSTON, TX · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. WESTMINSTER, MD · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA (5 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • University of North DakotaAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$220K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$780K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$220K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$230K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$220K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$110K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations28 reports
  2. Education18 reports
  3. Indian and Native American affairs14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE27 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES23 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Van Scoyoc Associates$500K
    14 reports
  2. Greystone Group LLC$280K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.