Federal contractor · SAN DIEGO, CA

BLUE TECH INC.

BLUE TECH INC. received $189.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 607 awards (−23% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.6B. Its largest customer was U.S. Coast Guard ($58.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$189.9M
New awards
607
Sole-source
0.4%
Single offer
16%
UEI
MDC5LDZKQAM4
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-ownedHUBZone firm

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 226.5MFY2017
  2. 276.6MFY2018
  3. 335.5MFY2019
  4. 246.8MFY2020
  5. 252.2MFY2021
  6. 266.2MFY2022
  7. 280.3MFY2023
  8. 277.9MFY2024
  9. 246.2MFY2025
  10. 189.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 80 awards
  3. 7 awards
  4. 51 awards
  5. 63 awards
  6. 8 awards
  7. 37 awards
  8. 12 awards
  9. 28 awards
  10. 11 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$181.7M96%
  2. Equipment maintenance$3M1.6%
  3. Professional services$3M1.6%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$1.8M1.0%
  5. Health & medical$347.2K0.2%
  6. Education & social services$50.4K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition16%
    US 39% · $30.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.4%
    US 30% · $697.3K
  • Single-offer competitions16%
    US 8.8% · $30M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Homeland Security · 5 awards
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards
  3. Department of Homeland Security · 1 awards
  4. General Services Administration · 1 awards
  5. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Coast Guard· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Jan 11, 2023 – Dec 29, 2025· 70Z07923FISD20007
  2. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 28, 2023 – Sep 29, 2026· 1605TB23F00143
  3. U.S. Special Operations Command· Hillsborough County, FL· IT & telecom· Jun 28, 2024 – Dec 18, 2025· H9241524F0075
  4. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 4, 2021 – Nov 25, 2025· M6785421F2019
  5. Transportation Security Administration· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 23, 2025 – May 22, 2026· 70T03025F7667N084
  6. U.S. Special Operations Command· Hillsborough County, FL· IT & telecom· Apr 22, 2021 – Apr 15, 2026· H9240421F0089
  7. Internal Revenue Service· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Dec 20, 2018 – Feb 10, 2026· 2032H519F00122
  8. Internal Revenue Service· Prince George's County, MD· IT & telecom· Jul 16, 2021 – Feb 10, 2026· 2032H521F00495

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $13.3M (36 subawards)

13 primes

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 4 subawards
  2. FAIRFAX, VA · 3 subawards
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 11 subawards
  4. MCLEAN, VA · 5 subawards
  5. FAIRFAX, VA · 3 subawards
  6. HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward
  7. KANSAS CITY, MO · 2 subawards
  8. BELTSVILLE, MD · 1 subaward
  9. ANAHEIM, CA · 2 subawards
  10. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $12.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $17.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $18M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $28.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $12.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $13.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

44 companies · $101.7M reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 18 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. RESTON, VA · 22 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 27 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 135 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS LLC$647.8M−50% in FY2026
    CINCINNATI, OH · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturingDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing+14 more
  2. WASHINGTON, DC · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management · Computer systems design and related servicesState · Computer systems design and related services+16 more
  3. DH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$419.4M+6.7% in FY2026
    LEESBURG, VA · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesArmy · Software publishers+18 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Blue Tech Inc.AI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2024
$20K
1 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2024
$50K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$30K
    1 reports
  2. 2024$20K
    1 reports

Top issues

  1. Science and technology2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES1 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP$50K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.