Federal contractor · MALVERN, PA

BLUESTONE - BURNS & MCDONNELL JV

BLUESTONE - BURNS & MCDONNELL JV received $7.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+2,230% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $12.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($7.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.2M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
55%
UEI
HNR3U137F4H5
Small business8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.5KFY2021
  2. 454KFY2022
  3. 1.6MFY2023
  4. 2.9MFY2024
  5. 310.2KFY2025
  6. 7.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$7.2M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$4M55%
  2. Construction & real property$3.3M45%

Where the work was performed

  1. Douglas County, KS$4M55%
  2. Saunders County, NE$3.3M45%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition55%
    US 39% · $4M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions55%
    US 8.7% · $4M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. MULTI-SITE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTS AND SITE INVESTIGATIONS OF UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA) FORMER GRAIN STORAGE SITES THROUGHOUT KANSAS$4M
    Department of the Army· Douglas County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Feb 2, 2026 – Feb 2, 2026· W912DQ26FA034
  2. PHASE 5 OMADI FORMATION ASSESSMENT FORMER NEBRASKA ORDNANCE PLANTOPERABLE UNIT 2 (GROUNDWATER) MEAD, NEBRASKA$3.3M
    Department of the Army· Saunders County, NE· Construction & real property· Dec 17, 2025 – Dec 17, 2025· W912DQ26FA021
  3. USDA FS/PP/DD$997K
    Department of the Army· Chester County, PA· Construction & real property· May 23, 2024 – Jan 15, 2026· W912DQ24F3033

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ENERGY EFFICIENCY & CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC$8.9M−103% in FY2026
    SWAYZEE, IN · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE SERVICES INC$11.7M−98% in FY2026
    DENHAM SPRINGS, LA · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ARDL INC$10.9M+38% in FY2026
    MOUNT VERNON, IL · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.