Federal contractor · SPRINGFIELD, VA

BOWHEAD GLOBAL SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, LLC

BOWHEAD GLOBAL SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, LLC received $7.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (−65% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $65.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($7.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.5M
New awards
14
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HQ3BVC2UUXM2
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.2MFY2022
  2. 10MFY2023
  3. 25.4MFY2024
  4. 21.5MFY2025
  5. 7.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 13 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$4.6M62%
  2. Professional services$2.8M37%
  3. Equipment maintenance$93.8K1.3%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $8.6M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $8.6M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 4 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Research & development· Nov 17, 2023 – May 19, 2026· W911QX24C0005
  2. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Professional services· Aug 14, 2024 – Jun 9, 2026· FA251824C0005
  3. Department of the Army· Mobile County, AL· Professional services· Sep 19, 2024 – Mar 17, 2026· W9127824F0253
  4. Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Feb 12, 2026 – Feb 12, 2026· W81K0426FA178
  5. Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Equipment maintenance· Sep 15, 2025 – Feb 12, 2026· W912HZ25FA060
  6. Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Professional services· Oct 29, 2025 – Oct 29, 2025· W912HZ26FA006
  7. Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Professional services· Sep 11, 2025 – Oct 27, 2025· W912HZ25FA067
  8. Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Jan 30, 2026 – Apr 20, 2026· W912HZ26FA050

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $65K reported

  1. SELECT GROUP FEDERAL, LLC THE$65K
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EAST PITTSBURGH, PA · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other professional, scientific, and technical servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ALLIANCE WSP JV, LLC$25.5M−87% in FY2026
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. DALLAS, TX · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.