Federal contractor · CEDAR CITY, UT

BP LIVESTOCK, INC.

BP LIVESTOCK, INC. received -$124.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−114% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.5M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management (-$124.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$124.7K
New awards
5
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
VXK2KAENMRU7
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 113.7KFY2017
  2. 584.1KFY2018
  3. 231.4KFY2019
  4. 54.9KFY2020
  5. 89KFY2021
  6. 213.9KFY2022
  7. 649.6KFY2023
  8. 743.7KFY2024
  9. 902.2KFY2025
  10. -124.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Bureau of Land Management-$124.7K0.0%
    5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

  1. Iron County, UT$59.8K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. IRONWOOD BUFFELGRASS SPRAY$320.1K
    Bureau of Land Management· Mohave County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 8, 2023 – May 20, 2026· 140L6423P0040
  2. CENTRAL BEAVER COUNTY WEED CONTROL$80K
    Bureau of Land Management· Iron County, UT· Facilities & utilities· May 19, 2023 – May 11, 2026· 140L5723P0021
  3. THIS IS A COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION PRAIRIE DOG PLAGUE ABATEMENT IN IRON & BEAVER COUNTIES PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR SUBPARTS 12.6 AND 13.1, AS SUPPLEMENTED WITH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE. THIS COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SO$66.6K
    Bureau of Land Management· Iron County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jan 24, 2024 – Jun 24, 2026· 140L5724C0002
  4. MOUNTIAN HOME WEED CONTROL IN BEAVER COUNTY$26.2K
    Bureau of Land Management· Iron County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jun 14, 2023 – May 26, 2026· 140L5723P0022
  5. TERRY BADLANDS WSA NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL$3,785
    Bureau of Land Management· Custer County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Jul 15, 2025 – Aug 6, 2026· 140L3625P0065

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BRUSHWACKER INC$1.5M−67% in FY2026
    MAHNOMEN, MN · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  2. MANFORD C GLOCK$1.6M−92% in FY2026
    SPARKS, NV · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  3. DENA NENA HENASH$1.4M−100% in FY2026
    FAIRBANKS, AK · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.