Federal contractor · ABERDEEN, MD

BRAVURA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC

BRAVURA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC received $9.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (−11% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $387.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($9.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9.7M
New awards
9
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
S3M8M4AB7CN1
Parent company
BRAVURA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 118.4MFY2017
  2. 137.4MFY2018
  3. 95.2MFY2019
  4. -4.3MFY2020
  5. -695.5KFY2021
  6. 4.6MFY2022
  7. 9.5MFY2023
  8. 7.3MFY2024
  9. 10.9MFY2025
  10. 9.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$4.9M50%
  2. IT & telecom$4.7M49%
  3. Professional services$116.8K1.2%
  4. Research & development$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Richmond County, GA· Education & social services· Dec 20, 2022 – Apr 30, 2026· W9124923F0016
  2. Department of the Army· Hardin County, KY· IT & telecom· Oct 22, 2024 – Mar 27, 2026· W519TC25FA002
  3. Defense Microelectronics Activity· Sacramento County, CA· IT & telecom· Jan 25, 2021 – May 19, 2026· HQ072721F0002
  4. Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· IT & telecom· May 10, 2022 – May 29, 2026· W91YTZ22F0106
  5. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· Apr 21, 2022 – Mar 17, 2026· W9124J22F0023
  6. Department of the Army· Chattahoochee County, GA· Professional services· Aug 30, 2022 – Jun 3, 2026· W9124D22P0154
  7. Department of the Army· Richland County, SC· IT & telecom· Nov 26, 2024 – Nov 19, 2025· W9124C25FA001
  8. Defense Contract Management Agency· Harford County, MD· IT & telecom· Apr 3, 2025 – Apr 16, 2026· S5121A25FE005

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SPIDER STRATEGIES, INC.$26.6M−23% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. DECILOG, INC.$31.7M−89% in FY2026
    MELVILLE, NY · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.