Federal contractor · ABERDEEN, MD
BRAVURA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC
BRAVURA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC received $9.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (−11% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $387.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($9.3M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $9.7M
- New awards
- 9
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- S3M8M4AB7CN1
- Parent company
- BRAVURA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 118.4MFY2017
- 137.4MFY2018
- 95.2MFY2019
- -4.3MFY2020
- -695.5KFY2021
- 4.6MFY2022
- 9.5MFY2023
- 7.3MFY2024
- 10.9MFY2025
- 9.7MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$9.3M96%6 awards
- Defense Microelectronics Activity$346.4K3.6%1 awards
- Defense Contract Management Agency$23.2K0.2%1 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Education & social services$4.9M50%
- IT & telecom$4.7M49%
- Professional services$116.8K1.2%
- Research & development$5000.0%
Where the work was performed
- Richmond County, GA$4.9M50%
- Hardin County, KY$4M41%
- Sacramento County, CA$346.4K3.6%
- Newport News city, VA$275.7K2.8%
- Chattahoochee County, GA$116.8K1.2%
- Richland County, SC$71.1K0.7%
- Harford County, MD$23.2K0.2%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Richmond County, GA· Education & social services· Dec 20, 2022 – Apr 30, 2026· W9124923F0016
- ISO PROJECT$3.7MDefense Microelectronics Activity· Sacramento County, CA· IT & telecom· Jan 25, 2021 – May 19, 2026· HQ072721F0002
- Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· IT & telecom· May 10, 2022 – May 29, 2026· W91YTZ22F0106
- Department of the Army· Chattahoochee County, GA· Professional services· Aug 30, 2022 – Jun 3, 2026· W9124D22P0154
- Department of the Army· Richland County, SC· IT & telecom· Nov 26, 2024 – Nov 19, 2025· W9124C25FA001
- Defense Contract Management Agency· Harford County, MD· IT & telecom· Apr 3, 2025 – Apr 16, 2026· S5121A25FE005
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- SPIDER STRATEGIES, INC.$26.6M−23% in FY2026ARLINGTON, VA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- BEAT-ATC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY$26.6M+13% in FY2026SAN ANTONIO, TX · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- DECILOG, INC.$31.7M−89% in FY2026MELVILLE, NY · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.