Federal contractor · HIGASHIKURUME

BRIGHT CO., LTD.

BRIGHT CO., LTD. received $357K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−8.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $8.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($357K).

Obligations · FY2026
$357K
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
21%
UEI
JASKJFEB5787
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 546.1KFY2017
  2. 784.9KFY2018
  3. 872KFY2019
  4. 1.9MFY2020
  5. 562KFY2021
  6. 2.9MFY2022
  7. 267.8KFY2023
  8. 392.3KFY2024
  9. 388.5KFY2025
  10. 357KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$219.4K61%
  2. Facilities & utilities$73.8K21%
  3. Equipment maintenance$55.4K16%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$8,4402.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$357K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition21%
    US 39% · $73.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions21%
    US 8.8% · $73.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Apr 22, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· FA520926P0014
  2. Department of the Air Force· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 8, 2025 – Dec 4, 2025· FA520925P0085
  3. Department of the Air Force· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2025 – Oct 1, 2025· FA520926F5008
  4. Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· Sep 11, 2024 – Apr 13, 2026· FA520924P0113
  5. Department of the Air Force· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 19, 2025 – Oct 23, 2025· FA520925P0116
  6. Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· May 15, 2026 – May 15, 2026· FA520926F0122
  7. Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· FA520926F0112

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JEM ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS$382.3K−100% in FY2026
    MESSERICH, DEU · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Ventilation, heating, air-conditioning, and refrigeration equipment manufacturingAir Force · Water, sewage and other systemsAir Force · Building equipment contractors
  2. MURAKAMIRINGYO, YK$306.3K+9.1% in FY2026
    HIROSHIMA, JPN · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. H.V.A.C. LLC$606.6K−15% in FY2026
    NORTH POLE, AK · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Services to buildings and dwellingsAir Force · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenanceAir Force · Building equipment contractors

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.