Federal contractor · BRIGHTON, MA

BRIGHTON MARINE, INC.

BRIGHTON MARINE, INC. received $152.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−0.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.5B. Its largest customer was Defense Health Agency ($152.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$152.9M
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MEPHSGELBYB5
Other than small businessNonprofit
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 141.2MFY2017
  2. 143.1MFY2018
  3. 144.4MFY2019
  4. 151.9MFY2020
  5. 156.1MFY2021
  6. 159.2MFY2022
  7. 156.3MFY2023
  8. 158.1MFY2024
  9. 154.2MFY2025
  10. 152.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Health Agency$152.9M100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Health & medical$152.9M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Suffolk County, MA$152.9M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $152.9M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $152.9M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. MANAGED HEALTH CARE PLAN SERVICES FROM A DESIGNATED PROVIDER$469.2M
    Defense Health Agency· Suffolk County, MA· Health & medical· Sep 28, 2023 – Mar 30, 2026· HT940223C0004

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHRISTUS HEALTH$468.2M+4.8% in FY2026
    IRVING, TX · 2 entities · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Insurance carriers
  2. INTERNATIONAL SOS GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC$513.3M−16% in FY2026
    TREVOSE, PA · 2 entities · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Insurance carriers
  3. PACMED CLINICS$532M+3.8% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Insurance carriers

Showing the top 3 of 12 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Brighton MarineAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$370K
13 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2026
$650K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$20K
    3 reports
  2. 2025$370K
    13 reports
  3. 2026$260K
    7 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense16 reports
  2. Health issues6 reports
  3. Veterans4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE13 reports
  3. Veterans Affairs - Dept of (VA)4 reports
  4. Defense - Dept of (DOD)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. ML Strategies, LLC$270K
    6 reports
  2. Strategic Marketing Innovations$120K
    6 reports
  3. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$120K
    3 reports
  4. Cardinal Point Partners$100K
    7 reports
  5. Greenberg Traurig, LLP$40K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.