Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK
BRISTOL-BB&E JV LLC
BRISTOL-BB&E JV LLC received $9.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−50% vs FY2025). Since FY2025: $28.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($8.1M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $9.4M
- New awards
- 16
- Sole-source
- 100%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- E1ZFQT3AR5G8
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 18.7MFY2025
- 9.4MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$8.1M86%14 awards
- Department of the Army$1.3M14%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$6.6M70%
- IT & telecom$1.5M16%
- Facilities & utilities$1.3M14%
Where the work was performed
- Norfolk city, VA$4.8M51%
- Abroad$1.5M16%
- Jefferson County, KY$840.2K8.9%
- Anchorage Municipality, AK$780K8.3%
- Onslow County, NC$588.8K6.3%
- Jefferson County, IN$486.4K5.2%
- Philadelphia County, PA$182.7K1.9%
- Lake County, IL$174.4K1.9%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $9.4M
- Sole-source awards100%US 30% · $9.4M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Defense · 9 awards
- Department of Defense · 2 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Sep 19, 2025 – May 13, 2026· N4008525F1175
- Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Sep 19, 2025 – May 21, 2026· N4008525F1209
- Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Jan 30, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026· N4008526F0384
- Department of the Army· Jefferson County, KY· Facilities & utilities· Feb 20, 2026 – Feb 20, 2026· W912QR26FA065
- Department of the Navy· Onslow County, NC· Professional services· Dec 30, 2025 – Dec 30, 2025· N4008526F0177
- Department of the Army· Jefferson County, IN· Facilities & utilities· Jun 5, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· W912QR26FA155
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- MULTI-MAC JOINT VENTURE$25.6M−44% in FY2026SAN DIEGO, CA · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- HERDT CONSULTING INC$25.5M−15% in FY2026CHELSEA, AL · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- TOTAL LOGISTICS SB JOINT VENTURE$28.2M−48% in FY2026MANASSAS, VA · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.