Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

BRISTOL-BB&E JV LLC

BRISTOL-BB&E JV LLC received $9.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−50% vs FY2025). Since FY2025: $28.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($8.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9.4M
New awards
16
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
E1ZFQT3AR5G8
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 18.7MFY2025
  2. 9.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 14 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$6.6M70%
  2. IT & telecom$1.5M16%
  3. Facilities & utilities$1.3M14%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$1.5M16%
  2. Lake County, IL$174.4K1.9%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $9.4M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $9.4M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 9 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Sep 19, 2025 – May 13, 2026· N4008525F1175
  2. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Sep 19, 2025 – May 21, 2026· N4008525F1209
  3. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Professional services· Jan 30, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026· N4008526F0384
  4. Department of the Navy· IT & telecom· Jul 11, 2025 – Mar 12, 2026· N6817125P8009
  5. Department of the Navy· IT & telecom· Jul 10, 2025 – May 20, 2026· N6817125P0041
  6. Department of the Army· Jefferson County, KY· Facilities & utilities· Feb 20, 2026 – Feb 20, 2026· W912QR26FA065
  7. Department of the Navy· Onslow County, NC· Professional services· Dec 30, 2025 – Dec 30, 2025· N4008526F0177
  8. Department of the Army· Jefferson County, IN· Facilities & utilities· Jun 5, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· W912QR26FA155

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MULTI-MAC JOINT VENTURE$25.6M−44% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HERDT CONSULTING INC$25.5M−15% in FY2026
    CHELSEA, AL · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. TOTAL LOGISTICS SB JOINT VENTURE$28.2M−48% in FY2026
    MANASSAS, VA · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.