Federal contractor · MERRITT ISLAND, FL

BSH MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC

BSH MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC received $9.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (+2,431% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $61.8M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($9.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9.8M
New awards
12
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FHHJRMWJY9Z3
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 10.9MFY2017
  2. 16.7MFY2018
  3. 81.3KFY2019
  4. -33.5KFY2020
  5. 291KFY2021
  6. 19.4MFY2022
  7. 2.6MFY2023
  8. 1.7MFY2024
  9. 388.9KFY2025
  10. 9.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 12 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$9.8M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Pima County, AZ$44.1K0.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Brevard County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Apr 8, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· SPE60326C5011
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Burlington County, NJ· Facilities & utilities· Jul 19, 2018 – Jan 12, 2026· SPE60318C5022
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Carroll County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Sep 20, 2018 – Feb 27, 2026· SPE60318C5040
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Pima County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 28, 2018 – Feb 17, 2026· SPE60318C5065
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Carroll County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Sep 18, 2018 – Dec 19, 2025· SPE60318C5031
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Curry County, NM· Facilities & utilities· Sep 28, 2018 – Dec 19, 2025· SPE60318C5056
  7. Defense Logistics Agency· Carroll County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Sep 18, 2018 – Oct 30, 2025· SPE60318C5030
  8. Defense Logistics Agency· Elmore County, ID· Facilities & utilities· Sep 20, 2018 – May 26, 2026· SPE60318C5050

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TEXAS CITY, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage
  2. SULAIBIYA, KWT · 2 entities · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage
  3. AWALI, BHR · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.