Federal contractor · MERRITT ISLAND, FL
BSH MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC
BSH MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC received $9.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (+2,431% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $61.8M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($9.8M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $9.8M
- New awards
- 12
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- FHHJRMWJY9Z3
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 10.9MFY2017
- 16.7MFY2018
- 81.3KFY2019
- -33.5KFY2020
- 291KFY2021
- 19.4MFY2022
- 2.6MFY2023
- 1.7MFY2024
- 388.9KFY2025
- 9.8MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Defense Logistics Agency$9.8M100%12 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$9.8M100%
Where the work was performed
- Brevard County, FL$9.6M98%
- Carroll County, MD$143.2K1.5%
- Pima County, AZ$44.1K0.4%
- Burlington County, NJ$17.4K0.2%
- Elmore County, ID$16.6K0.2%
- Davis County, UT$13.6K0.1%
- Curry County, NM$7,3220.1%
- Santa Barbara County, CA$1,0820.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Defense Logistics Agency· Brevard County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Apr 8, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· SPE60326C5011
- Defense Logistics Agency· Burlington County, NJ· Facilities & utilities· Jul 19, 2018 – Jan 12, 2026· SPE60318C5022
- Defense Logistics Agency· Carroll County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Sep 20, 2018 – Feb 27, 2026· SPE60318C5040
- Defense Logistics Agency· Pima County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 28, 2018 – Feb 17, 2026· SPE60318C5065
- Defense Logistics Agency· Carroll County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Sep 18, 2018 – Dec 19, 2025· SPE60318C5031
- Defense Logistics Agency· Curry County, NM· Facilities & utilities· Sep 28, 2018 – Dec 19, 2025· SPE60318C5056
- Defense Logistics Agency· Carroll County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Sep 18, 2018 – Oct 30, 2025· SPE60318C5030
- Defense Logistics Agency· Elmore County, ID· Facilities & utilities· Sep 20, 2018 – May 26, 2026· SPE60318C5050
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- BWC TEXAS TERMINALS, LLC$12.2MTEXAS CITY, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage
- SULAIBIYA, KWT · 2 entities · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage
- AWALI, BHR · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Warehousing and storage
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.