Federal contractor · TUCSON, AZ
BURNS WALD-HOPKINS SHAMBACH ARCHITECTS, INC.
BURNS WALD-HOPKINS SHAMBACH ARCHITECTS, INC. received $993.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 17 awards (−28% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $13.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($778.5K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $993.5K
- New awards
- 17
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 78%
- UEI
- E61DR3S77AB5
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 398.1KFY2017
- 546.2KFY2018
- 498.7KFY2019
- 1.6MFY2020
- 816.7KFY2021
- 3MFY2022
- 1.6MFY2023
- 3MFY2024
- 1.4MFY2025
- 993.5KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$778.5K78%2 awards
- Smithsonian Institution$247.6K25%2 awards
- Indian Health Service-$32.6K0.0%13 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$993.5K100%
Where the work was performed
- Pima County, AZ$778.5K78%
- District of Columbia, DC$247.6K25%
- Maricopa County, AZ$70.7K7.1%
- Santa Fe County, NM$64.3K6.5%
- Rio Arriba County, NM$7,8240.8%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition78%US 39% · $778.5K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions78%US 8.7% · $778.5K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Smithsonian Institution· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Aug 28, 2018 – Dec 4, 2025· F16CW10394
- Smithsonian Institution· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Dec 4, 2019 – Dec 17, 2025· 33330220FF0010041
- BLDG 261 REDESIGN FOR EA-37B$778.5KDepartment of the Air Force· Pima County, AZ· Construction & real property· Jun 3, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· FA487726F0169
- Department of the Air Force· Pima County, AZ· Construction & real property· Aug 8, 2025 – Jun 12, 2026· FA487725F0258
- Indian Health Service· Santa Fe County, NM· Construction & real property· Mar 8, 2023 – Sep 11, 2026· 75H70123F30019
- Indian Health Service· King County, WA· Construction & real property· Oct 13, 2021 – Feb 18, 2026· 75H70122F30011
- PIMC PAVEMENT (PH23PH01H6)$234.5KIndian Health Service· King County, WA· Construction & real property· Nov 29, 2023 – Feb 3, 2026· 75H70124F30024
- PIMC HVAC DESIGN$220.9KIndian Health Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· Aug 15, 2023 – Mar 23, 2026· 75H70123F30023
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- SYMVIONICS, INC.$3M−100% in FY2026ARCADIA, CA · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- CYNTERGY-SLA JV$3.3M−96% in FY2026WICHITA FALLS, TX · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- KHA CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC.$3.4M−28% in FY2026PENSACOLA, FL · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.