Federal contractor · HOPKINS, MN

CANON MEDICAL INFORMATICS INC

CANON MEDICAL INFORMATICS INC received $1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−83% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $15.1M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($909.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1M
New awards
16
Sole-source
26%
Single offer
74%
UEI
MYXZLL2C9NL4
Parent company
TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

12 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $2.5M in FY2026 together.

  1. CANON MEDICAL INFORMATICS INCHOPKINS, MN · Family page
    $1M
  2. TOSHIBA CORPORATIONKAWASAKI-SHI, JPN
    $1.5M
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. $0
  6. $0
  7. $0
  8. $0
  9. $0
  10. $0
  11. $0
  12. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2017
  2. 959.7KFY2018
  3. 915.3KFY2019
  4. 840KFY2020
  5. 1.2MFY2021
  6. 1.1MFY2022
  7. 1MFY2023
  8. 1.1MFY2024
  9. 5.8MFY2025
  10. 1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 14 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$856.1K84%
  2. Health & medical$162.5K16%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1M
  • Sole-source awards26%
    US 30% · $263.6K
  • Single-offer competitions74%
    US 8.7% · $755.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Health Agency· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 25, 2025 – Jun 10, 2026· HT942525CE003
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Suffolk County, MA· Equipment maintenance· Sep 28, 2023 – Sep 24, 2026· 36C24123F0263
  3. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Mar 30, 2022 – Mar 16, 2026· W81K0022P0076
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Milwaukee County, WI· Health & medical· May 26, 2021 – Oct 7, 2025· 36C25221F0203
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Hennepin County, MN· Equipment maintenance· Apr 18, 2024 – Mar 3, 2026· 36C26324F0048
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Los Angeles County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Jan 30, 2024 – Jun 2, 2026· 36C26224C0081
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· San Francisco County, CA· Health & medical· Oct 1, 2021 – Oct 2, 2025· 36C26122F0001
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· St. Louis city, MO· Equipment maintenance· Nov 25, 2025 – Nov 25, 2025· 36C25526F0017

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $679.7K reported

  1. AUSTIN, TX · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $1.9M reported

  1. AUSTIN, TX · 2 subawards
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 14 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HAMPTON, GBR · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Software publishers
  2. VETERANS FIRST INITIATIVE LLC$4.5M−100% in FY2026
    HAYMARKET, VA · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance
  3. ALLEGIANCE SUPPLY, INC.$10.4M−69% in FY2026
    CARLSBAD, CA · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CANON MEDICAL INFORMATICS INC (12 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Toshiba CorporationAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$64K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$218K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$62K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$56K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$64K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$36K
    2 reports

Top issues

Who was contacted

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. BlueWater Strategies$218K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.