Federal contractor · MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

CAST IRON SYSTEMS, INC

No contract obligations recorded for CAST IRON SYSTEMS, INC in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
P5ELVCT6PZB3
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION company family: 39 registered entities, $1.1B in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. $586.1M
  2. $485.8M
  3. $1.8M
  4. $1.5M
  5. COGNOS CORPORATIONBURLINGTON, MA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 0FY2020

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for CAST IRON SYSTEMS, INC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

327 companies · $2.5B reported

  1. ANNAPOLIS, MD · 496 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ROUNDTABLE TECHNOLOGY LLC$146M
    NORFOLK, VA · 296 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 248 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

68 companies · $751.1M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 51 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ATLANTA, GA · 21 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 17 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 89 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SALIENT CRGT, INC.$3.3B+35% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 2 entities · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related servicesVeterans Affairs · Data processing, hosting, and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services+3 more
  2. CGI FEDERAL INC.$4B+2.1% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 12 entities · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related servicesSocial Security Administration · Computer systems design and related services+6 more
  3. THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC$2.8B+16% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesOffices, Boards and Divisions · Computer systems design and related services+10 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (39 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (IBM)AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$3.6M
5 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$15.7M
$15.7M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$5.4M
    8 reports
  2. 2024$5.2M
    8 reports
  3. 2025$3.6M
    5 reports
  4. 2026$1.4M
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code18 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  3. Computer industry14 reports
  4. Labor issues, antitrust and workplace14 reports
  5. Trade (domestic and foreign)14 reports
  6. Copyright, patent and trademark11 reports
  7. Defense9 reports
  8. Education9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES18 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE17 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Ernst & Young LLP (Washington Council Ernst & Young)$240K
    9 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.