Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

CCI FACILITY SUPPORT SERVICES LLC

CCI FACILITY SUPPORT SERVICES LLC received $1.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−77% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $30.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.9M
New awards
12
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GBVUAKJYV1W7
Other than small business8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CCI UTILITY AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC company family: 44 registered entities, $276.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CCI UTILITY AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $33.8M
  2. $79.1M
  3. $75.8M
  4. $31.1M
  5. CCI GROUP, LLCANCHORAGE, AK
    $26.6M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.5MFY2021
  2. 5.8MFY2022
  3. 4.5MFY2023
  4. 5.7MFY2024
  5. 8MFY2025
  6. 1.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 12 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.3M68%
  2. Equipment maintenance$326.6K18%
  3. Professional services$270.8K15%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.9M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $1.9M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 5 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Aug 29, 2025 – Jan 14, 2026· W9124P25FA125
  2. Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Equipment maintenance· May 21, 2025 – May 26, 2026· W912HQ25F0075
  3. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Facilities & utilities· May 5, 2026 – May 5, 2026· W9124P26FA305
  4. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Facilities & utilities· May 8, 2026 – May 8, 2026· W9124P26FA341
  5. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Apr 24, 2026 – Apr 24, 2026· W9124P26FA249
  6. Department of the Army· Cumberland County, NC· Equipment maintenance· Aug 13, 2025 – Feb 11, 2026· W912HQ25F0150
  7. Department of the Army· Doña Ana County, NM· Professional services· May 20, 2026 – May 20, 2026· W912HQ26FA097
  8. DRAFTING$209.1K
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Jan 14, 2025 – Jan 13, 2026· W9124P25F0134

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

14 companies · $6.3M reported

  1. PHOENIX, AZ · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. PEVELY, MO · 3 subawards · Utility system construction
  3. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward · Utility system construction

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $3.6M reported

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 32 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. WEST CHESTER, PA · 2 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. BLAIRSVILLE, GA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 36 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KORTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY$554.3M−26% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionNavy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. WESTON SOLUTIONS INC$1B−46% in FY2026
    WEST CHESTER, PA · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Utility system constructionNavy · Utility system construction+2 more
  3. ARCHER WESTERN FEDERAL JV$397.8M−63% in FY2026
    CHICAGO, IL · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionNavy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.