Federal contractor · KANSAS CITY, MO

CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION

CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION received $8.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 23 awards (−30% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $134M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$8.2M
New awards
23
Sole-source
2.4%
Single offer
88%
UEI
RVRNVXHZJR63
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION company family: 20 registered entities, $45.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATIONFAIRFAX, VA · Family page
    $35.7M
  2. CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATIONJACKSONVILLE, FL
    $908.1K
  3. CDM SMITH INC.BOSTON, MA
    $287.2K
  4. CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATIONDENVER, CO
    $30.6K
  5. CDM CONSTRUCTORS INCMAITLAND, FL
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 16.9MFY2017
  2. 12MFY2018
  3. 13.4MFY2019
  4. 11.6MFY2020
  5. 14.4MFY2021
  6. 20.1MFY2022
  7. 15.7MFY2023
  8. 10.1MFY2024
  9. 11.7MFY2025
  10. 8.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$8M98%
    20 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$200K2.4%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$7.6M92%
  2. Research & development$541.3K6.6%
  3. Facilities & utilities$98.6K1.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. Jackson County, MO$3.7M45%
  2. Salt Lake County, UT$1.3M15%
  3. Queens County, NY$789.5K9.6%
  4. Union County, NJ$500K6.1%
  5. Bergen County, NJ$500K6.1%
  6. 72$475K5.8%
  7. Johnson County, MO$388.1K4.7%
  8. Niagara County, NY$200K2.4%
  9. King County, WA$167.9K2.0%
  10. San Juan County, CO$98.6K1.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition91%
    US 39% · $7.4M
  • Sole-source awards2.4%
    US 30% · $200K
  • Single-offer competitions88%
    US 8.7% · $7.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$200K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. FEASIBILITY STUDY AT THE PCE PLUME SUPERFUND$4.1M
    Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Construction & real property· Jul 21, 2022 – Sep 17, 2026· W912DQ22F3063
  2. ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR A PRE-DESIGN INVESTIGATION (PDI) AND REMEDIAL DESIGN (RD) FOR THE EIGHTEEN MILE CREEK SUPERFUND SITE, OPERABLE UNIT 3 (OU3), LOCATED IN NIAGARA COUNTY, NEW YORK.$3.4M
    Department of the Army· Jackson County, MO· Construction & real property· Feb 12, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· W912DQ26FA030
  3. BATTERY RECYCLING REMEDIAL DESIGN, PUERTO RICO$1.9M
    Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Feb 4, 2025 – Jun 30, 2026· W912DQ25F3018
  4. WOLFF ALPORT RD$1.8M
    Department of the Army· Queens County, NY· Construction & real property· Jan 13, 2022 – Jan 12, 2026· W912DQ22F3029
  5. ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR PRE-DESIGN INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIAL DESIGN AT WHITEMAN COMMUNICATION TRANSMITTER SITE KNOB NOSTER, JOHNSON COUNTY, MISSOURI.$1.8M
    Department of the Army· Johnson County, MO· Construction & real property· Oct 31, 2023 – Jan 21, 2026· W912DQ24F3000
  6. ROEBLING STEEL SUPERFUND SITE OU5$1.7M
    Department of the Army· Burlington County, NJ· Construction & real property· Sep 7, 2022 – Aug 13, 2026· W912DQ22F3086
  7. ER21-5124$1.4M
    Department of the Army· Jackson County, MO· Research & development· Apr 16, 2021 – Dec 19, 2025· W912HQ21C2006
  8. VHA PCE PLUME PP/ROD$1.1M
    Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Construction & real property· Feb 25, 2026 – Feb 25, 2026· W912DQ26FA042

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.3M (16 subawards)

13 sub-recipients

  1. ACTION ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC$437.3K35%
    BIRMINGHAM, AL · 1 subaward
  2. GEOENVIROTECH INC$150.7K12%
    GUAYNABO, PR · 1 subaward
  3. HDR ENGINEERING, INC.$145.6K12%
    WOODCLIFF LAKE, NJ · 1 subaward
  4. ALS CANADA LTD.$136.6K11%
    NORTH VANCOUVER, CAN · 2 subawards
  5. PRODUCT RECOVERY MANAGEMENT INC$67.7K5.4%
    BUTNER, NC · 1 subaward
  6. GSI ENVIRONMENTAL INC.$67.4K5.3%
    HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward
  7. JAVIER E BIDOT & ASSOCIATES P.S.C$56.8K4.5%
    CAGUAS, PR · 1 subaward
  8. GREENWICH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNS INC.$47.5K3.8%
    NEW YORK, NY · 2 subawards
  9. NORTOL ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY INC$41.8K3.3%
    SAN JUAN, PR · 1 subaward
  10. THE DREDGING PROFESSOR LLC$36.4K2.9%
    MERIDIAN, MS · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $11.2K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$11.2K100%
    AUSTIN, TX · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 15% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $612K paid out · $47.2K received
  • FY2022: $1.1M paid out · $40K received
  • FY2023: $2.6M paid out · $23.9K received
  • FY2024: $3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $1.2M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $1.3M paid out · $11.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

212 companies · $77.4M reported

  1. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC$3.6M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 14 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. C. H. GUERNSEY & COMPANY$3.4M
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 16 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RICHARD GRUBB AND ASSOCIATES, INC.$2.4M
    CRANBURY, NJ · 15 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes that pay it

19 companies · $28.7M reported

  1. HEALTH, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF$15.5M
    NEW ORLEANS, LA · 4 subawards
  2. WSP USA ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE INC.$6.6M
    BLUE BELL, PA · 22 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. FLUOR MARINE PROPULSION, LLC$1.3M
    GREENVILLE, SC · 7 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 20 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LEISNOI DIVERSIFIED-KEMRON 8A JV, LLC$74.8M+4% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Remediation and other waste management servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC$154.7M−125% in FY2026
    CINCINNATI, OH · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.$231.6M+167% in FY2026
    ATLANTA, GA · 3 entities · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Remediation and other waste management servicesArmy · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION (20 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • CDM SMITH INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$0
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$10K
PAC giving · 2026
$25.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$10K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$0
    4 reports
  3. 2025$0
    4 reports
  4. 2026$0
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  2. Environment and Superfund14 reports
  3. Natural resources14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. Army - Dept of (Corps of Engineers)14 reports
  2. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)14 reports
  3. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  4. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The Ferguson Group, LLC$10K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$20K78%
  2. Democratic$5,50022%

PACs sponsored

  • CDM SMITH INC. NATIONAL PAC$36K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.