Federal contractor · CEDAR CITY, UT

CEDAR CITY CORP

CEDAR CITY CORP received $10.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−72% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $257.1K. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($10.9K). It also received $379.3K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$10.9K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LHSLP6NZLB39
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 17.8KFY2017
  2. 10.3KFY2018
  3. 20.2KFY2020
  4. 40.8KFY2021
  5. 30KFY2022
  6. 45.6KFY2023
  7. 42.5KFY2024
  8. 39KFY2025
  9. 10.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$10.9K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Iron County, UT$10.9K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $10.9K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $10.9K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Iron County, UT· Facilities & utilities· May 1, 2023 – May 6, 2026· 140L5723P0012

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

CEDAR CITY CORP received $379.3K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 7 actions (1 new awards), −77% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 20.116 · Airport Improvement Program ($749.9K).

Assistance · FY2026
$379.3K
New awards
1
Actions
7
Since FY2021
$11.4M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 2.7MFY2021
  2. 1MFY2022
  3. 1.6MFY2023
  4. 3.9MFY2024
  5. 1.7MFY2025
  6. 379.3KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$379.3K100%

Top programs

  1. 20.116 · Airport Improvement Program$749.9K100%
  2. 20.106 · Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and COVID-19 Airports Programs$23.2K6.1%
  3. 10.923 · Emergency Watershed Protection Program-$393.8K0.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Transportation

Largest awards

  1. 20.106 · Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and COVID-19 Airports Programs· Federal Aviation Administration· Project grant· Jun 10, 2025 – Jul 28, 2026· 34900050532025
  2. 20.116 · Airport Improvement Program· Federal Aviation Administration· Formula grant· Jun 5, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· 34900050552026
  3. 20.106 · Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and COVID-19 Airports Programs· Federal Aviation Administration· Formula grant· Aug 12, 2022 – Jul 20, 2026· 34900050452022
  4. 20.106 · Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and COVID-19 Airports Programs· Federal Aviation Administration· Formula grant· Jul 17, 2023 – Nov 12, 2025· 34900050462023
  5. 20.106 · Airport Improvement Program, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Programs, and COVID-19 Airports Programs· Federal Aviation Administration· Formula grant· Aug 27, 2024 – Mar 25, 2026· 34900050502024
  6. 10.923 · Emergency Watershed Protection Program· Natural Resources Conservation Service· Cooperative agreement· Feb 22, 2022 – Apr 9, 2026· NR228D43XXXXC011

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $9,200 (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $113.1K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $222.4K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $465K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $778.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $157.3K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $9,200 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $1.7M reported

  1. SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 8 subawards
  2. GOVERNORS OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$675K
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 3 subawards
  3. SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GRAND JUNCTION, CO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for air transportation
  2. ALASKA AEROFUEL, INC$1.1M−15% in FY2026
    FAIRBANKS, AK · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for air transportation
  3. EVERTS AIR FUEL, INC$6M−10% in FY2026
    FAIRBANKS, AK · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Support activities for air transportation

Showing the top 3 of 4 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.