Federal contractor · BELGIUM, WI

CEDAR VALLEY CHEESE, INC.

CEDAR VALLEY CHEESE, INC. received $74.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−82% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $2.3M. Its largest customer was Agricultural Marketing Service ($74.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$74.2K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
ZTRGQGUJXFJ8
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.8MFY2024
  2. 420KFY2025
  3. 74.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Agricultural Marketing Service$74.2K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$74.2K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Ozaukee County, WI$74.2K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. COMMODITIES FOR USG FOOD DONATIONS: 2000011023/4400002317/4100033099/CHEESE CHED YEL SHRED BAG-6/5 LB$74.2K
    Agricultural Marketing Service· Ozaukee County, WI· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 7, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025· 123J1426F0014

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

CEDAR VALLEY CHEESE, INC. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2022
$310.9K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 295.1KFY2022
  2. 15.8KFY2023
  3. 0FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2022–FY2025.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SARGENTO FOODS INC$2.3M
    PLYMOUTH, WI · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Marketing Service · Dairy product manufacturing
  2. GH DAIRY$1.8M+62% in FY2026
    ONTARIO, CA · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Marketing Service · Dairy product manufacturing
  3. NEW DAIRY OPCO, LLC$3.4M+2,834% in FY2026
    DALLAS, TX · 3 entities · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Marketing Service · Dairy product manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.