Federal contractor · ROCKLIN, CA

CELL MARQUE CORP

No contract obligations recorded for CELL MARQUE CORP in FY2026. Since FY2017: $640.7K.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
MQJ2EEPELWU5
Parent company
MERCK KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the EMD MILLIPORE CORP company family: 6 registered entities, $953.7K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. EMD MILLIPORE CORPBURLINGTON, MA · Family page
    $771.1K
  2. SIGMA-ALDRICH, INC.SAINT LOUIS, MO
    $163.9K
  3. BIORELIANCE CORPORATIONROCKVILLE, MD
    $41.3K
  4. VERSUM MATERIALS US, LLCTEMPE, AZ
    $0
  5. CERILLIANT CORPORATIONROUND ROCK, TX
    -$22.5K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 123.8KFY2017
  2. 20.1KFY2018
  3. 22.9KFY2019
  4. 115.6KFY2020
  5. 132.2KFY2021
  6. 76.8KFY2022
  7. 103.6KFY2023
  8. 45.8KFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for CELL MARQUE CORP in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

12 companies · $5.2M reported

  1. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$3M
    LEXINGTON, MA · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$726.9K
    NEW YORK, NY · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY$504.4K
    FORT COLLINS, CO · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 60 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MG SCIENTIFIC, INC.$4.6M−37% in FY2026
    PLEASANT PRAIRIE, WI · 14% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingFood and Drug Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+8 more
  2. PROTEINSIMPLE$2.7M+1.1% in FY2026
    SAN JOSE, CA · 4 entities · 12% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNational Institutes of Health · Pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturingArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+8 more
  3. BIO RAD LABORATORIES INC$13.8M+0.8% in FY2026
    HERCULES, CA · 9 entities · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNational Institutes of Health · Pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturingArmy · Pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturing+9 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of EMD MILLIPORE CORP (6 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • EMD Millipore CorporationAI match · 100%
  • Sigma-Aldrich CorporationAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$280K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$960K
$960K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$360K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$90K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$280K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$230K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Health issues12 reports
  2. Trade (domestic and foreign)6 reports
  3. Manufacturing5 reports
  4. Miscellaneous tariff bills3 reports
  5. Chemicals and chemical industry2 reports
  6. Food industry (safety, labeling)1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES13 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE11 reports
  3. Health & Human Services - Dept of (HHS)10 reports
  4. Commerce - Dept of (DOC)9 reports
  5. Office of Management & Budget (OMB)3 reports
  6. Energy - Dept of2 reports
  7. Food & Drug Administration (FDA)2 reports
  8. U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)2 reports
  9. Treasury - Dept of1 reports
  10. White House Office1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Todd Strategy Group$140K
    3 reports
  2. Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP$0
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.