Federal contractor · LOGAN, UT

CENTEVA LLC

CENTEVA LLC received $1.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (+147% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $54.9M. Its largest customer was Office of the Chief Financial Officer ($581.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.1M
New awards
8
Sole-source
7.4%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
VFPKHHHDDBR2
Parent company
CENTEVA, LLC
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 11.5MFY2017
  2. 10.7MFY2018
  3. 8MFY2019
  4. 7.6MFY2020
  5. 6.9MFY2021
  6. 5.2MFY2022
  7. 2.6MFY2023
  8. 978.1KFY2024
  9. 425.3KFY2025
  10. 1.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Office of the Chief Financial Officer$581.2K55%
    1 awards
  2. Nuclear Regulatory Commission$393.2K37%
    2 awards
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs$78.2K7.4%
    5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$974.5K93%
  2. Education & social services$78.2K7.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Jackson County, MO$581.2K55%
  2. Montgomery County, MD$250K24%
  3. Cache County, UT$143.2K14%
  4. Frederick County, MD$78.2K7.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition7.4%
    US 39% · $78.2K
  • Sole-source awards7.4%
    US 30% · $78.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs$78.2K
    Department of Veterans Affairs · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. SCINET ENGINEERING PROGRAM SUPPORT FOR THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA), DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES CENTER (DISC)$581.2K
    Office of the Chief Financial Officer· Jackson County, MO· IT & telecom· Feb 27, 2026 – Feb 27, 2026· 12314426P0018
  2. TO PROCURE A SOFTWARE SOLUTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE NRC ACQUISITION PORTAL IN ORDER TO MODERNIZE AND STANDARDIZE ACQUISITION TOOLS AND PROCESSES AND REPORTING CAPABILITIES WITHIN THE AGENCY.$568K
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission· Cache County, UT· IT & telecom· Apr 21, 2023 – Apr 15, 2026· 31310023F0040
  3. DIVA BPA CALL FOR DOCUMENTUM SUPPORT FOR THE SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION LOCAL AREA NETWORK AND ELECTRONIC SAFE (SLES)$250K
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Mar 31, 2026 – Aug 11, 2026· 31310026F0014
  4. BPA FOR ECMS & IFAMS TRAINING: ORDER #6$187.4K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Frederick County, MD· Education & social services· Jul 31, 2026 – Jul 31, 2026· 36C10X26N0143
  5. ELECTRONIC CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ECMS) AND INTEGRATED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (IFAMS) ENTERPRISE TRAINING, ORDER #1 VAAA CPS$62.3K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Frederick County, MD· Education & social services· Aug 6, 2024 – Mar 5, 2026· 36C10X24N0169
  6. ELECTRONIC CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ECMS) AND INTEGRATED FINANCIAL ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (IFAMS) ENTERPRISE TRAINING, ORDER #2 VAAA AIS$49.6K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Frederick County, MD· Education & social services· Aug 29, 2024 – Nov 12, 2025· 36C10X24N0170
  7. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) FOR ELECTRONIC CONTRACTING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ECMS) AND INTEGRATED FINANCIAL ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (IFAMS) TRAINING, ORDER #3 VAAA CPS$28.3K
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Frederick County, MD· Education & social services· Dec 18, 2024 – Mar 4, 2026· 36C10X25N0110
  8. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) FOR ELECTRONIC CONTRACTING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ECMS) AND INTEGRATED FINANCIAL ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (IFAMS) TRAINING: ORDER # 5 AIS$7,108
    Department of Veterans Affairs· Frederick County, MD· Education & social services· May 27, 2026 – May 27, 2026· 36C10X26N0105

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $16M (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. TEKSYNAP CORPORATION$16M100%
    RESTON, VA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $899K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $5M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $16M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $21.9M reported

  1. TEKSYNAP CORPORATION$16.9M
    RESTON, VA · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC$5M
    ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THE GREEN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC$1.8M+33% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX STATION, VA · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related servicesVeterans Affairs · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. COPPER RIVER GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC$563.8K−100% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MAKPAR-NUAXIS JV 2 LLC$539.4K
    CENTREVILLE, VA · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.