Federal contractor · GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO

CH2M - BURNS & MCDONNELL JOINT VENTURE

CH2M - BURNS & MCDONNELL JOINT VENTURE received $45.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−98% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $40.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($45.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$45.8K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G7KDE5FTR225
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.8MFY2017
  2. 13.8MFY2018
  3. 1.8MFY2019
  4. 7.5MFY2020
  5. 526KFY2021
  6. 3.7MFY2022
  7. 1.4MFY2023
  8. 3.9MFY2024
  9. 2.5MFY2025
  10. 45.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$45.8K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$45.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Craven County, NC$45.8K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. P228 ATC MCAS CHERRY POINT PCAS/COMMISSIONING TO$1.7M
    Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· Construction & real property· Feb 20, 2024 – Apr 29, 2026· N4008524F4348

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $0 (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $61.8K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $46.6K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $461.1K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $473.6K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

6 companies · $1M reported

  1. CANNON BOSTON INC$380.9K
    BOSTON, MA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MID-ATLANTIC SURVEYING AND LAND DESIGN, INC.$317.1K
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. GEOENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, INC.$145.8K
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MK ENGINEERS, LTD.$6.8M+3.8% in FY2026
    MILILANI, HI · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. INNOVATIVE MATERIALS & PROCESSES INC$5.4M
    RAPID CITY, SD · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ALBERTO IZZO & PARTNERS S.R.L.$7.5M−89% in FY2026
    NAPOLI, ITA · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.