Federal contractor · GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO

CH2M HILL CLARK NEXSEN ENERGY PARTNERS JV

No contract obligations recorded for CH2M HILL CLARK NEXSEN ENERGY PARTNERS JV in FY2026. Since FY2017: $135M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
14
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
E25BZXVJ8144
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 19.9MFY2017
  2. 7.4MFY2018
  3. 7.6MFY2019
  4. 7.1MFY2020
  5. 8.6MFY2021
  6. 12.9MFY2022
  7. 18.6MFY2023
  8. 38.6MFY2024
  9. 14.3MFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 14 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Arapahoe County, CO· Construction & real property· Sep 14, 2023 – Feb 23, 2026· N3943023F4717
  2. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 16, 2024 – Mar 11, 2026· N3943024F4080
  3. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 12, 2024 – Nov 6, 2025· N3943024F4092
  4. Department of the Navy· Honolulu County, HI· Construction & real property· Aug 5, 2019 – Apr 2, 2026· N6274219F0338
  5. Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· Sep 21, 2022 – Apr 15, 2026· N3319122F4377
  6. Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· Sep 14, 2023 – Mar 25, 2026· N6274223F0356
  7. Department of the Navy· Onslow County, NC· Construction & real property· Dec 1, 2022 – Nov 3, 2025· N4008523F4244
  8. Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 23, 2024 – Feb 17, 2026· N3943024F4093

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $197.7K (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. BIRMINGHAM, AL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $447.4K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $757.4K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $959.6K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $690.6K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $820.4K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $197.7K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

10 companies · $3.9M reported

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 10 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ARLINGTON, TX · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MNDPI PACIFIC JV$53.4M+65% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SAN DIEGO, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HOLLYWOOD, MD · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.