Federal contractor · AURORA, MN

CHANDLER JOHNSON

CHANDLER JOHNSON received $96.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+732% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.6M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($96.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$96.1K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
YE9XN3LDKLB1
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 89.7KFY2017
  2. 174.3KFY2018
  3. 360.3KFY2019
  4. 118.6KFY2020
  5. 319.9KFY2021
  6. 191.4KFY2022
  7. 162KFY2023
  8. 43.7KFY2024
  9. 11.5KFY2025
  10. 96.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$96.1K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$96.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. St. Louis County, MN$96.1K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. FIA DATA COLLECTION, CALL #45, OH WEST_2026$56.1K
    Forest Service· St. Louis County, MN· Research & development· Mar 2, 2026 – Mar 2, 2026· 12444826F0009
  2. FIA DATA COLLECTION - CALL #47 - NEW YORK WEST_2026$40K
    Forest Service· St. Louis County, MN· Research & development· Mar 11, 2026 – Mar 11, 2026· 12444826F0011

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MARKOV ENTERPRISES LLC$123.2K
    FORT DODGE, IA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Scientific research and development services
  2. SUMMERS, GLEN$99.9K
    BLOOMINGDALE, IN · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Scientific research and development services
  3. THE MARKOSKY ENGINEERING GROUP INC$252.4K−100% in FY2026
    LIGONIER, PA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.