Federal contractor · CHESAPEAKE, VA

CHENEGA MISSION PRODUCTS, LLC

CHENEGA MISSION PRODUCTS, LLC received $1.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (−79% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $14.5M. Its largest customer was Indian Health Service ($921.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.7M
New awards
8
Sole-source
96%
Single offer
3.9%
UEI
C5LSSYNC3N23
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.7MFY2024
  2. 8.1MFY2025
  3. 1.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$1.4M81%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$263.2K16%
  3. Professional services$50K3.0%
  4. Health & medical$15.3K0.9%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.7M
  • Sole-source awards96%
    US 30% · $1.6M
  • Single-offer competitions3.9%
    US 8.7% · $65.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Internal Revenue Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 21, 2024 – Jun 29, 2026· 2032H524C00072
  2. Indian Health Service· Oklahoma County, OK· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 28, 2025 – Apr 22, 2026· 75H71125C00004
  3. Indian Health Service· Oklahoma County, OK· IT & telecom· Mar 17, 2026 – Mar 17, 2026· 75H71126P00052
  4. Indian Health Service· Oklahoma County, OK· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 11, 2025 – Aug 14, 2026· 75H71125C00015
  5. Indian Health Service· Oklahoma County, OK· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 3, 2025 – Apr 23, 2026· 75H71125C00006
  6. Indian Health Service· Comanche County, OK· IT & telecom· Sep 9, 2025 – Jan 14, 2026· 75H71125P00256
  7. Indian Health Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Professional services· Dec 12, 2025 – Dec 12, 2025· 75H71226F28002
  8. Indian Health Service· Glacier County, MT· Health & medical· Jul 28, 2026 – Jul 28, 2026· 75H70926F07002

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $334.6K reported

  1. PASCAGOULA, MS · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LAS VEGAS, NV · 2 entities · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Software publishers
  2. ASHBURN, VA · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Software publishers
  3. INTACT TECHNOLOGY INC$68.4M+5% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Software publishers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.