Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

CHENEGA RELIABLE SERVICES LLC

CHENEGA RELIABLE SERVICES LLC received $32.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 42 awards (−6.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $160.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($11M).

Obligations · FY2026
$32.6M
New awards
42
Sole-source
72%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
E6E1RHGUYLL6
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC company family: 46 registered entities, $602.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLCCHANTILLY, VA · Family page
    $158.5M
  2. SECURIGENCE LLCLEESBURG, VA
    $88.1M
  3. $73.8M
  4. $64.2M
  5. $28.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 53.9KFY2019
  2. 5MFY2020
  3. 15MFY2021
  4. 20MFY2022
  5. 17.6MFY2023
  6. 35.3MFY2024
  7. 34.7MFY2025
  8. 32.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 18 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 8 awards
  4. 2 awards
  5. 3 awards
  6. 2 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 2 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$14.4M44%
  2. Facilities & utilities$7.2M22%
  3. Research & development$4.1M13%
  4. Professional services$3.6M11%
  5. Health & medical$3.3M10.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. 66$3M9.3%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition72%
    US 39% · $23.5M
  • Sole-source awards72%
    US 30% · $23.5M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 9 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· El Paso County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Apr 4, 2024 – Mar 27, 2026· W9128F24F0089
  2. Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· Professional services· Sep 10, 2024 – Mar 13, 2026· W9127824F0266
  3. Department of the Air Force· Yuba County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 8, 2023 – Dec 17, 2025· FA890323C0027
  4. Transportation Security Administration· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Sep 25, 2020 – Sep 24, 2026· 70T02020C9NOTD420
  5. Department of Energy· Clark County, NV· Construction & real property· May 16, 2025 – Sep 22, 2026· 89233125CNA000403
  6. Defense Health Agency· Bexar County, TX· Research & development· Feb 25, 2026 – Mar 12, 2026· HT942626CE005
  7. Federal Acquisition Service· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Aug 15, 2024 – Jun 11, 2026· 47QFWA24C0011
  8. Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· Construction & real property· Feb 19, 2025 – Feb 4, 2026· FA890325F0004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

48 companies · $275.9M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. CJC SUPPORT SERVICES LLC$25.4M
    ALDIE, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. CHARLESTON, SC · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes that pay it

13 companies · $65.6M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 19 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CENTREVILLE, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. PASCAGOULA, MS · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 145 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TULSA, OK · 36 entities · 17% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesDefense Health Agency · Computer systems design and related services+11 more
  2. WOLF CREEK FEDERAL SERVICES LLC$692M−45% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 17 entities · 8.1% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesU.S. Coast Guard · Architectural, engineering, and related services+4 more
  3. AFFIGENT, LLC$3.1B−39% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 22 entities · 14% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesDepartmental Offices · Computer systems design and related services+4 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CHENEGA GLOBAL PROTECTION, LLC (46 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • CHENEGA CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
  • Chenega Supply Chain Solutions, LLCAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$250K
25 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$895K
$875K in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$49.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$250K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$250K
    18 reports
  3. 2025$250K
    25 reports
  4. 2026$145K
    14 reports

Top issues

  1. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code26 reports
  2. Small business14 reports
  3. Indian and Native American affairs11 reports
  4. Natural resources11 reports
  5. Budget and appropriations10 reports
  6. Government issues9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES55 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE55 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$300K
    6 reports
  2. Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC$280K
    9 reports
  3. Capitol Hill Policy Group LLC$180K
    10 reports
  4. Van Ness Feldman, LLP$140K
    10 reports
  5. RBW GROUP, LLC$115K
    6 reports
  6. THE BERNHARDT GROUP LLC$90K
    5 reports
  7. Mercury Public Affairs, LLC$10K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$49.5K100%

PACs sponsored

  • CHENEGA CORPORATION PAC (CHENEGA PAC)$131.6K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.