Federal contractor · DAYTON, OH

CHERYL A DAVIS LOGISTICS SERVICES

CHERYL A DAVIS LOGISTICS SERVICES received $114.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+30% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $820.6K. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($114.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$114.3K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DXCRVDEUUTV4
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 207.8KFY2017
  2. 0FY2019
  3. 225.2KFY2020
  4. 77.8KFY2023
  5. 107.5KFY2024
  6. 88KFY2025
  7. 114.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$114.3K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$114.3K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Greene County, OH$114.3K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $114.3K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $114.3K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Air Force$114.3K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. PROVIDES FOR LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT EXPERTISE TO THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE (RAAF) THROUGH INITIATING, COORDINATING, AND CONTROLLING PROGRAM FUNCTIONS DIRECTED TOWARD CORRECTING INTERNAL DEFICIENCIES AND IMPROVING LOGISTICS SUPPORT WITHIN THE RAAF.$114.3K
    Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Professional services· Dec 5, 2025 – Dec 5, 2025· FA863026CB002

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MAJOR 360, LLC$324.3K+2.2% in FY2026
    FLORISSANT, MO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. IMF TECHNOLOGIES LLC$289.5K
    RESTON, VA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. BLACK OPAL LLC$273.7K−100% in FY2026
    AUSTIN, TX · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.