Federal contractor · BELTSVILLE, MD
CHESAPEAKE MISSION CRITICAL LLC
CHESAPEAKE MISSION CRITICAL LLC received $308.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+163% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.2M. Its largest customer was National Institutes of Health ($145.6K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $308.8K
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 42%
- Single offer
- 47%
- UEI
- MBEXDV8KCKM5
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 450.3KFY2017
- 539.5KFY2018
- 554.8KFY2019
- 609.6KFY2020
- 628.5KFY2021
- 691KFY2022
- 806.8KFY2023
- 445.6KFY2024
- 117.6KFY2025
- 308.8KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- National Institutes of Health$145.6K47%2 awards
- 1 awards
- Department of the Army$24.1K7.8%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Other equipment & supplies$112.8K37%
- IT & telecom$106.5K34%
- Equipment maintenance$56.9K18%
- Professional services$32.6K11%
Where the work was performed
- Montgomery County, MD$178.2K58%
- District of Columbia, DC$106.5K34%
- Harford County, MD$24.1K7.8%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition89%US 39% · $276.2K
- Sole-source awards42%US 30% · $130.6K
- Single-offer competitions47%US 8.7% · $145.6K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 30, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026· 75N98026P00915
- UPS SYSTEM REPLACEMENT$106.5K
- BASE YEAR$96.4KDepartment of the Army· Harford County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Feb 14, 2023 – May 27, 2026· W91ZLK23P0019
- EATON SERVICE AGREEMENT$93.7KNational Institute of Standards and Technology· Montgomery County, MD· Professional services· Nov 22, 2023 – Jul 10, 2026· 1333ND24PNB180012
- National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Jun 22, 2026 – Jun 22, 2026· 75N98026P00834
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $373.5K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $155.9K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $139.6K received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $97.4K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
6 companies · $766.5K reported
- RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
- RAYTHEON COMPANY$144.2KTUCSON, AZ · 4 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
- FAIRFIELD, NJ · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- GIRAFFEWORKS, LLC$205K−79% in FY2026TALLAHASSEE, FL · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Building equipment contractors
- RECON GROUP, LLC$207.1K−100% in FY2026ELLICOTT CITY, MD · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Building equipment contractors
- MASCOTT EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.$207.6K+29% in FY2026PORTLAND, OR · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Building equipment contractors
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.