Federal contractor · SCOTTSDALE, AZ

CHILDHELP INC.

No contract obligations recorded for CHILDHELP INC. in FY2026. Since FY2019: $667.4K.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
CE8HDHA4JKN3
Other than small businessWoman-ownedNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 69.7KFY2019
  2. 66.6KFY2020
  3. 101.6KFY2021
  4. 94.6KFY2022
  5. 94.6KFY2023
  6. 137.8KFY2024
  7. 102.4KFY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for CHILDHELP INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

CHILDHELP INC. received -$47.3K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (0 new awards). Its largest program was 93.647 · Social Services Research and Demonstration (-$47.3K).

Assistance · FY2026
-$47.3K
New awards
0
Actions
1
Since FY2021
$3.8M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 872.6KFY2021
  2. 2MFY2022
  3. 1MFY2023
  4. 0FY2024
  5. 0FY2025
  6. -47.3KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants-$47.3K0.0%

Top programs

  1. 93.647 · Social Services Research and Demonstration-$47.3K0.0%

Largest awards

  1. 93.647 · Social Services Research and Demonstration· Administration for Children and Families· Project grant· Aug 30, 2023 – Sep 29, 2026· 90XP0488

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $1.2M (9 subawards)

4 primes

  1. PHOENIX, AZ · 1 subaward
  2. RICHMOND, VA · 5 subawards
  3. STATE OF TENNESSEE TN$81.9K6.8%
    NASHVILLE, TN · 2 subawards
  4. PHOENIX, AZ · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $850.9K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $799K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $4.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $790.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $10.2M reported

  1. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES$4.7M
    NASHVILLE, TN · 4 subawards
  2. PHOENIX, AZ · 6 subawards
  3. STATE OF TENNESSEE TN$410.6K
    NASHVILLE, TN · 8 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BOSTON, MA · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Education Activity · Educational support services
  2. PEAR DECK, INC.$253.3K+109% in FY2026
    EL SEGUNDO, CA · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Education Activity · Educational support services
  3. 100 WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS, LLC$261.1K0% in FY2026
    FLOYDS KNOBS, IN · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Education Activity · Educational support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • ChildhelpAI match · 99%
  • Childhelp USAAI match · 96%
Lobbying · 2025
$120K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$420K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$120K
    12 reports
  2. 2024$120K
    12 reports
  3. 2025$120K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$60K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations34 reports
  2. Health issues22 reports
  3. Welfare22 reports
  4. Family issues, abortion and adoption12 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE31 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES30 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$420K
    14 reports
  2. DiNino Associates, LLC$0
    15 reports
  3. BRACY TUCKER BROWN & VALANZANO DBA BROWN & ASSOCIATES$0
    13 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.