Federal contractor · COCOA BEACH, FL

CHINOOK SYSTEMS INC

CHINOOK SYSTEMS INC received $7.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 25 awards (−63% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $152.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($7.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.3M
New awards
25
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
1.4%
UEI
YYGATTQM9KD1
Parent company
CHINOOK SYSTEMS, INC
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.7MFY2017
  2. 4.8MFY2018
  3. 4.9MFY2019
  4. 8.3MFY2020
  5. 11.6MFY2021
  6. 29.1MFY2022
  7. 26.5MFY2023
  8. 36.3MFY2024
  9. 19.9MFY2025
  10. 7.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$7.2M99%
    10 awards
  2. National Institutes of Health$121.8K1.7%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Navy$7,7500.1%
    1 awards
  4. Office of the Inspector General$00.0%
    1 awards
  5. Washington Headquarters Services$00.0%
    3 awards
  6. Public Buildings Service-$9,9950.0%
    1 awards
  7. Environmental Protection Agency-$40.3K0.0%
    8 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$7.2M99%
  2. Construction & real property$79.3K1.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Prince George's County, MD$4.6M63%
  2. Charlottesville city, VA$1.6M22%
  3. Abroad$1.1M15%
  4. Marion County, FL$133.1K1.8%
  5. Montgomery County, MD$121.8K1.7%
  6. Washington County, RI$68.4K0.9%
  7. Pontotoc County, OK$53.7K0.7%
  8. Durham County, NC$33.5K0.5%
  9. Brevard County, FL$29.3K0.4%
  10. Charles County, MD$7,7500.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition1.4%
    US 39% · $105.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions1.4%
    US 8.7% · $105.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. PREVENTATIVE AND CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE FOR ADELPHI LABORATORY CENTER, MD$19M
    Department of the Army· Prince George's County, MD· Equipment maintenance· Sep 29, 2022 – Jun 11, 2026· W912DY22F0556
  2. PROCURE AND INSTALL DEFENSE FY24 BAS REPLACEMENT, WARSAW POLAND$8.2M
    Department of the Army· Equipment maintenance· Jun 27, 2024 – Jun 12, 2026· W912DY24F0179
  3. AWARD TO CHINOOK SYSTEMS INC. ON CONTRACT W912DY-20-D-0028. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL A UTILITY MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (UMCS) UPGRADES AND HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) UPGRADES AT FORT BRAGG, NC.$8M
    Department of the Army· Cumberland County, NC· Equipment maintenance· Sep 30, 2022 – Mar 5, 2026· W912DY22F0604
  4. U.S. ARMY RESERVE (USAR) FACILITY RELATED CONTROL SYSTEM (FCRS) INVENTORY$8M
    Department of the Army· Marion County, FL· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2021 – May 28, 2026· W912DY21F0619
  5. COMMISSIONING SERVICES$4.7M
    Washington Headquarters Services· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· Aug 13, 2025 – Mar 4, 2026· HQ003425FE187
  6. NICHOLSON BUILDING, BUILDING 2000, RIVANNA STATION, VA$4.5M
    Department of the Army· Charlottesville city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Aug 5, 2022 – May 14, 2026· W912DY22F0285
  7. ARNG CYBERSECURITY INVENTORY$3.9M
    Department of the Army· Pulaski County, AR· Equipment maintenance· Sep 30, 2024 – Jan 27, 2026· W912DY24F0668
  8. N2 TO BACNET BUILDING AUTOMATED SYSTEM COMMISSIONING EFFORT$3.6M
    Washington Headquarters Services· Brevard County, FL· Professional services· Sep 15, 2021 – Jan 30, 2026· HQ003421F0459

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $276.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $3.3M reported

  1. INFINITY LABS LLC$3M
    BEAVERCRK TWP, OH · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC$276.8K
    FAIRFIELD, NJ · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DARKHIVE INC.$53.4M+4,884% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. GRADKELL SYSTEMS INC$53.6M−16% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ECCALON, LLC$54.8M−6% in FY2026
    HANOVER, MD · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.