Federal contractor · GRAND RAPIDS, MI
CHOICE SERVICES INC
CHOICE SERVICES INC received $472.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−77% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($441.1K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $472.8K
- New awards
- 12
- Sole-source
- 7.6%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- CH5FAJW15SN5
- Parent company
- CHOICE SERVICES INC
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 689.8KFY2017
- 1MFY2018
- 533.9KFY2019
- 362.1KFY2020
- 765KFY2021
- 415.7KFY2022
- 806.1KFY2023
- 1.8MFY2024
- 2.1MFY2025
- 472.8KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$441.1K93%11 awards
- Department of the Air Force$31.7K6.7%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$441.1K93%
- Professional services$31.7K6.7%
Where the work was performed
- Juneau County, WI$182.7K39%
- Pima County, AZ$90.8K19%
- Salt Lake County, UT$55.2K12%
- Allen County, IN$51.7K11%
- Macomb County, MI$36K7.6%
- Harrison County, MS$31.7K6.7%
- Dane County, WI$24.8K5.2%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition7.6%US 39% · $36K
- Sole-source awards7.6%US 30% · $36K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- DINNING FACILITY ATTENDANT$229.3KDepartment of the Army· Pima County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Jun 6, 2025 – Apr 21, 2026· W50S6S25CA001
- Department of the Army· Juneau County, WI· Facilities & utilities· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· W50S9H26FA019
- Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Dec 9, 2024 – Dec 11, 2025· W50S9A25PA010
- Department of the Army· Allen County, IN· Facilities & utilities· Oct 31, 2024 – May 13, 2026· W50S7W25PA001
- Department of the Army· Dane County, WI· Facilities & utilities· Feb 29, 2024 – Feb 26, 2026· W50S9F24PA013
- Department of the Army· Macomb County, MI· Facilities & utilities· Oct 27, 2025 – Feb 23, 2026· W50S8526FA003
- Department of the Air Force· Harrison County, MS· Professional services· Apr 24, 2026 – Apr 24, 2026· FA446026P0024
- Department of the Army· Juneau County, WI· Facilities & utilities· Apr 23, 2026 – Apr 23, 2026· W50S9H26FA017
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- COMPASS GROUP ITALIA S.P.A.$3.8M−60% in FY2026MILANO, ITA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services
- ACCL INTERNATIONAL DMCC$4.5M+213% in FY2026DUBAI, ARE · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services
- FITTEST, INC$3.6M+1.6% in FY2026INCHEON, KOR · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.