Federal contractor · GRAND RAPIDS, MI

CHOICE SERVICES INC

CHOICE SERVICES INC received $472.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−77% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($441.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$472.8K
New awards
12
Sole-source
7.6%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CH5FAJW15SN5
Parent company
CHOICE SERVICES INC
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 689.8KFY2017
  2. 1MFY2018
  3. 533.9KFY2019
  4. 362.1KFY2020
  5. 765KFY2021
  6. 415.7KFY2022
  7. 806.1KFY2023
  8. 1.8MFY2024
  9. 2.1MFY2025
  10. 472.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 11 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$441.1K93%
  2. Professional services$31.7K6.7%

Where the work was performed

  1. Dane County, WI$24.8K5.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition7.6%
    US 39% · $36K
  • Sole-source awards7.6%
    US 30% · $36K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Pima County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Jun 6, 2025 – Apr 21, 2026· W50S6S25CA001
  2. Department of the Army· Juneau County, WI· Facilities & utilities· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· W50S9H26FA019
  3. Department of the Army· Salt Lake County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Dec 9, 2024 – Dec 11, 2025· W50S9A25PA010
  4. Department of the Army· Allen County, IN· Facilities & utilities· Oct 31, 2024 – May 13, 2026· W50S7W25PA001
  5. Department of the Army· Dane County, WI· Facilities & utilities· Feb 29, 2024 – Feb 26, 2026· W50S9F24PA013
  6. Department of the Army· Macomb County, MI· Facilities & utilities· Oct 27, 2025 – Feb 23, 2026· W50S8526FA003
  7. Department of the Air Force· Harrison County, MS· Professional services· Apr 24, 2026 – Apr 24, 2026· FA446026P0024
  8. Department of the Army· Juneau County, WI· Facilities & utilities· Apr 23, 2026 – Apr 23, 2026· W50S9H26FA017

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COMPASS GROUP ITALIA S.P.A.$3.8M−60% in FY2026
    MILANO, ITA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services
  2. ACCL INTERNATIONAL DMCC$4.5M+213% in FY2026
    DUBAI, ARE · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services
  3. FITTEST, INC$3.6M+1.6% in FY2026
    INCHEON, KOR · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.