Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK
CHUGACH LOGISTICS AND FACILITY SERVICES JV, LLC
CHUGACH LOGISTICS AND FACILITY SERVICES JV, LLC received $89.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (+18% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $214.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($64M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $89.9M
- New awards
- 12
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- JVC4GJN2REH4
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 5MFY2023
- 43.4MFY2024
- 76MFY2025
- 89.9MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$64M71%3 awards
- Department of the Navy$26.1M29%8 awards
- Department of the Army-$198.7K0.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$89M99%
- Construction & real property$925K1.0%
Where the work was performed
- Hillsborough County, FL$27.2M30%
- Montgomery County, AL$22.1M25%
- Churchill County, NV$15.7M17%
- Val Verde County, TX$14.8M16%
- San Diego County, CA$10.4M12%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Hillsborough County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Dec 20, 2023 – Jun 11, 2026· FA481424C0002
- Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, AL· Facilities & utilities· May 30, 2024 – May 26, 2026· FA300224C0008
- Department of the Air Force· Val Verde County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Feb 28, 2023 – Jun 9, 2026· FA300223C0005
- Department of the Navy· Churchill County, NV· Facilities & utilities· Apr 1, 2026 – May 29, 2026· N6247326F0259
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Jun 3, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· N6247326F0416
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Jul 23, 2025 – May 27, 2026· N6247325F0388
- Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Dec 18, 2025 – Jun 12, 2026· N6247326F0057
- Department of the Navy· Churchill County, NV· Construction & real property· Jun 3, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· N6247326F0415
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
1 company · $67.2M reported
- AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.$67.2MGERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
Primes that pay it
No prime reported paying it.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- INUSSUK A/S$186.7M−7.2% in FY2026NUUSSUAQ, GRL · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Facilities support services
- ECC INTERNATIONAL, LLC$203.9M−100% in FY2026VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 3 entities · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Facilities support services
- READINESS MANAGEMENT SUPPORT LC$148M−8% in FY2026PANAMA CITY, FL · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Facilities support services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.