Federal contractor · SEOUL

CHUNG LIM CLEAN CO.,LTD.

CHUNG LIM CLEAN CO.,LTD. received $221K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−28% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $843.7K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($221K).

Obligations · FY2026
$221K
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
EH4DZ7JWZ963
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 102.5KFY2017
  2. 51.2KFY2018
  3. 9.3KFY2019
  4. 95.1KFY2023
  5. 59.8KFY2024
  6. 304.8KFY2025
  7. 221KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$221K100%
    5 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$148.8K67%
  2. Facilities & utilities$72.2K33%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$221K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: CLEAN HVAC DUCT OF GFOQS AND SOQS AT CAMP HUMPHREYS$148.8K
    Department of the Army· Equipment maintenance· May 11, 2026 – May 18, 2026· W91QVN26PA026
  2. EOC ROOM IN B #388, B #755 AND B #842, CAMP CARROLL$36.9K
    Department of the Army· Facilities & utilities· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· W90VN926FA139
  3. DEC 25$20K
    Department of the Army· Facilities & utilities· Dec 1, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025· W90VN926FC011
  4. OCT 25$9,511
    Department of the Army· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2025 – Oct 1, 2025· W90VN926FC010
  5. HOOD DUCT$5,777
    Department of the Army· Facilities & utilities· May 1, 2026 – May 1, 2026· W90VN926FC109

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JAEYOUNG S&C$493K−56% in FY2026
    DAEGU, KOR · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellingsArmy · Waste treatment and disposal
  2. CURRY AND ASSOCIATES INC.$482.9K−100% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Services to buildings and dwellingsArmy · Building equipment contractors
  3. MCCALL SERVICE NW, LLC$205.2K−71% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, FL · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.