Federal contractor · TULSA, OK

CITIZEN CONTRACTING GROUP LLC

CITIZEN CONTRACTING GROUP LLC received $1.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 18 awards (+78% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $6M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($1.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.1M
New awards
18
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
4.1%
UEI
R7CYRNQZBSH3
Small businessWoman-ownedVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2022
  2. 3MFY2023
  3. 258.2KFY2024
  4. 599.6KFY2025
  5. 1.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 17 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$880.8K74%
  2. Professional services$216.3K18%
  3. Facilities & utilities$63.7K5.3%
  4. Transportation & logistics$18.7K1.6%
  5. IT & telecom$11.9K1.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. 72$44.4K4.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · -$158.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$203.2K
  • Single-offer competitions4.1%
    US 8.7% · $44.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Wagoner County, OK· Equipment maintenance· Jul 12, 2023 – May 5, 2026· 36C24823P1521
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Laramie County, WY· Professional services· Jun 30, 2024 – May 22, 2026· 36C25924P1028
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Jackson County, MO· Equipment maintenance· Mar 5, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· 36C25526P0095
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Tulsa County, OK· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 21, 2026 – Sep 21, 2026· 36C24W26P0047
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Cumberland County, NC· Professional services· Jul 22, 2024 – Mar 26, 2026· 36C24624P1525
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Vermilion County, IL· Professional services· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· 36C25226P0395
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Marion County, IN· Professional services· Oct 3, 2025 – Dec 15, 2025· 36C25026C0006
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs· Equipment maintenance· Feb 26, 2026 – Feb 26, 2026· 36C24826N0395

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $3,057 reported

  1. HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHIEF TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC$1.2M+12% in FY2026
    PHOENIX, AZ · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Investigation and security servicesVeterans Affairs · Building equipment contractors
  2. SECURITY INTEGRATION GROUP INC$1.2M+5.8% in FY2026
    BAYAMON, PR · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Investigation and security services
  3. NAPERVILLE, IL · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Investigation and security servicesVeterans Affairs · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.